What's the process opt-in at this point? I'm a bit unclear. I see that
epel-release was built for EPEL7 (and that the git branch is epel7
instead of el7).
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Dne pátek, 13. prosince 2013 17:42:24 CEST, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700
> "T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
...
>>
>> Yeah, opt-in sounds like a much better idea. :-)
>
>
> Yeah, it does mean slower, but I think it's good to only have those
> things in that are for sure maintained.
-1 from me, if I get you right that everyone should ack the packages to be
branched
I often don't find enough time for the things I'm not paid for, so I see a
potential to miss some "please add your package if you want to have it in
EPEL7" plea
but that doesn't mean I'd call these things "unmaintained", just the
response times are a bit longer ...
K.
--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol(a)jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
:: easily be explained by stupidity."
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel