November 2023 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2247722] New: gssdp-1.6.3 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247722 Bug ID: 2247722 Summary: gssdp-1.6.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gssdp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.6.3 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.6.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.6.2-3.fc39 URL: https://developer.gnome.org/gssdp/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1262/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gssdp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247722 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2250333] New: subunit-1.4.4 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250333 Bug ID: 2250333 Summary: subunit-1.4.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: subunit Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: loganjerry(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: apevec(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, loganjerry(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.4.4 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.4.4 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.4.3-1.fc40 URL: https://launchpad.net/subunit Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7802/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/subunit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250333 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2250318] New: [abrt] nemo: nemo_icon_view_update_click_to_rename_mode(): nemo-desktop killed by SIGABRT

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250318 Bug ID: 2250318 Summary: [abrt] nemo: nemo_icon_view_update_click_to_rename_mode(): nemo-desktop killed by SIGABRT Product: Fedora Version: 39 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:9133ad679eaec0aae9f632c1045c559cdf154af4;VAR IANT_ID=cinnamon; Component: nemo Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: dani(a)letai.org.il QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: nemo-5.8.5-3.fc39 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.11 type: CCpp reason: nemo-desktop killed by SIGABRT journald_cursor: s=fb7198a024aa43b997d030749bcd8514;i=11b4b0;b=6f8a584ea97e4abe8d2c92eb2ad63dcb;m=3bc99b5364;t=60a5ca1015b31;x=6a747b7ddc55f690 executable: /usr/bin/nemo-desktop cmdline: nemo-desktop cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope rootdir: / uid: 1000 kernel: 6.5.11-300.fc39.x86_64 package: nemo-5.8.5-3.fc39 runlevel: N 5 backtrace_rating: 4 crash_function: nemo_icon_view_update_click_to_rename_mode Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (2 frames) #6 nemo_icon_view_update_click_to_rename_mode at ../src/nemo-icon-view.c:2235 #7 nemo_icon_view_update_click_to_rename_mode.isra.0 at ../src/nemo-icon-view.c:2229 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250318 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2250265] s390 cross-compiler isn't suiteable for building openssl

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> --- (In reply to Dmitry Belyavskiy from comment #4) > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #3) > > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2) > > > It seems you are using the cross-gcc compilers. Reassigning. > > > > > > My understanding is that those cross-compilers are not intended for > > > userspace. CentOS 9 Stream has cross-compilers that work for userspace. We > > > > That's correct, the Fedora cross-compilers are supplied without any > > userspace libs as their are intended for kernel or firmware development. But > > they are built with sysroot support, so the users can provide the required > > libs on their own. > > I planned to use qemu for the next tests, it should resolve the lack of the > userspace libs, doesn't it? I don't think so, with the sysroot you should install (eg with rpm2cpio) the native s390x lib & headers into the /usr/s390x-linux-gnu/sys-root (see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cross-gcc/blob/rawhide/f/cross-gcc.spe...), then the compiler should pick them, but I haven't tried that personally > > > plan to forward-port those to Fedora 40. > > > > Dmitry, why are trying to cross-compile openssl instead of doing a native > > build? > > Cross-compilation+qemu is suitable for test automation, native build is not. > See, e.g. > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/.github/workflows/cross- > compiles.yml - I wanted to implement smth similar for my purposes. I would think a shared or dedicated native VM would be easier for CI purposes (available from IBM Cloud for open source projects), but probably not here ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2250265] s390 cross-compiler isn't suiteable for building openssl

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #3) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2) > > It seems you are using the cross-gcc compilers. Reassigning. > > > > My understanding is that those cross-compilers are not intended for > > userspace. CentOS 9 Stream has cross-compilers that work for userspace. We > > That's correct, the Fedora cross-compilers are supplied without any > userspace libs as their are intended for kernel or firmware development. But > they are built with sysroot support, so the users can provide the required > libs on their own. I planned to use qemu for the next tests, it should resolve the lack of the userspace libs, doesn't it? > > plan to forward-port those to Fedora 40. > > Dmitry, why are trying to cross-compile openssl instead of doing a native > build? Cross-compilation+qemu is suitable for test automation, native build is not. See, e.g. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/.github/workflows/cross-co... - I wanted to implement smth similar for my purposes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2250301] New: javacc-7.0.13 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250301 Bug ID: 2250301 Summary: javacc-7.0.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: javacc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: hdegoede(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hdegoede(a)redhat.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, orion(a)nwra.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 7.0.13 Upstream release that is considered latest: 7.0.13 Current version/release in rawhide: 7.0.12-4.fc40 URL: http://javacc.org Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1422/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/javacc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250301 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2250265] s390 cross-compiler isn't suiteable for building openssl

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2) > It seems you are using the cross-gcc compilers. Reassigning. > > My understanding is that those cross-compilers are not intended for > userspace. CentOS 9 Stream has cross-compilers that work for userspace. We That's correct, the Fedora cross-compilers are supplied without any userspace libs as their are intended for kernel or firmware development. But they are built with sysroot support, so the users can provide the required libs on their own. > plan to forward-port those to Fedora 40. Dmitry, why are trying to cross-compile openssl instead of doing a native build? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2250265] s390 cross-compiler isn't suiteable for building openssl

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|jakub(a)redhat.com |dhowells(a)redhat.com CC| |dan(a)danny.cz, | |dhowells(a)redhat.com, | |epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fe | |doraproject.org, | |lkundrak(a)v3.sk Component|gcc |cross-gcc --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> --- It seems you are using the cross-gcc compilers. Reassigning. My understanding is that those cross-compilers are not intended for userspace. CentOS 9 Stream has cross-compilers that work for userspace. We plan to forward-port those to Fedora 40. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2249895] New: [abrt] cinnamon: module(): cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper:30:<module>:UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 188: invalid continuation byte

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249895 Bug ID: 2249895 Summary: [abrt] cinnamon: module(): cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper:30:<module>:UnicodeDecodeE rror: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 188: invalid continuation byte Product: Fedora Version: 39 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:cebb773c286181eac0244ca518a448fb3435226e;VAR IANT_ID=cinnamon; Component: cinnamon Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: zsolt.janosi(a)yandex.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, miketwebster(a)gmail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: cinnamon-5.8.4-5.fc39 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.11 runlevel: N 5 interpreter: cinnamon-5.8.4-5.fc39.x86_64 exception_type: UnicodeDecodeError type: Python3 kernel: 6.5.11-300.fc39.x86_64 cmdline: cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' executable: /usr/bin/cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper reason: cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper:30:<module>:UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 188: invalid continuation byte cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope uid: 1000 crash_function: module package: cinnamon-5.8.4-5.fc39 Truncated backtrace: cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper:30:<module>:UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 188: invalid continuation byte Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper", line 30, in <module> GLib.Variant("(isb)", (process_id, result.decode(), success)), ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 188: invalid continuation byte Local variables in innermost frame: __name__: '__main__' __doc__: ' Runs a command and then passes the output to Cinnamon via DBus asynchronously\n\nUsage: cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper ls ~/\n' __package__: None __loader__: <_frozen_importlib_external.SourceFileLoader object at 0x7f6958d001d0> __spec__: None __annotations__: {} __builtins__: <module 'builtins' (built-in)> __file__: '/usr/bin/cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper' __cached__: None subprocess: <module 'subprocess' from '/usr/lib64/python3.12/subprocess.py'> sys: <module 'sys' (built-in)> setproctitle: <built-in function setproctitle> GLib: <GLibProxyModule <IntrospectionModule 'GLib' from '/usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/GLib-2.0.typelib'>> Gio: <GioProxyModule <IntrospectionModule 'Gio' from '/usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/Gio-2.0.typelib'>> process_id: 14 result: b'Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size\nactive ks42 21 Test Page 1024 bytes\n1st ks42 22 \xc3\x89nek tanmenet j\xc3\xb3 2016-2017 m\xc3 37888 bytes\n' success: True connection: <Gio.DBusConnection object at 0x7f6957e37640 (GDBusConnection at 0x5598392acbc0)> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249895 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2247772] New: nwipe-0.35 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247772 Bug ID: 2247772 Summary: nwipe-0.35 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: nwipe Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: rebus(a)seznam.cz Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nick.craig.law(a)gmail.com, rebus(a)seznam.cz Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.35 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.35 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.34-3.fc39 URL: https://github.com/martijnvanbrummelen/nwipe Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7711/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nwipe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247772 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 2 weeks

1
15
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig November 2023