https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371984
--- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow <randy(a)electronsweatshop.com> ---
I decided to write the fedora-devel mailing list to get their input on how to
best solve this chicken and egg problem[0]. While writing that post, I realized
that there was a problem with the plan to use facls: if the p1_pam package were
updated after the ejabberd package set the needed facls on the binary, the
facls would be removed and the problem would return. Thus, I don't think that's
a viable option.
Perhaps having p1_pam create the ejabberd group is the best alternative I've
thought of so far, but I'll be interested to see if we get any replies on the
devel list.
[0]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.