On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>> C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they
>>> were
>>> >> designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design
>>> info
>>> >> available online.
>> >
>> > Please clarify 'dispatch' :-)
> Kufi with Sans (masquerading as the Arabic block of Droid Sans) and
> Naskh
> with Serif the same way (see the long fontconfig ruleset I referenced)
>
>
http://www.29arabicletters.com/foundry/?m=1-1-1&fid=26
> states Naskh was designed to complement Serif
>
> and
>
https://code.google.com/p/chromium-os/issues/detail?id=17382
> that chromium uses Kufi with Sans
That may have been the case, but it is my personal understanding that we
should dispatch Naskh with both Sans and Serif. Kufi is a horrible font
for
body text.
So make kufi a separate family and keep the old droid sans arabic for
sans? Or is it also horrible in some way?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot