On 2009-01-28 at 8:41:39 -0500, "Nicolas Mailhot"
<nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> wrote:
However if you don't you'll have to deal with the directory
ownership
of the common font directory (I purposefully didn't want to open this
particular can of worm) and other common files.
Also documentation can be bulky, especially when upstream provides in
in pdf or .doc form with embedded bitmaps of what the font looks like.
Well, it seems like there wouldn't be much of a case to obsolete -common
in that scenario, just move the license into each subpackage.
~spo