Time for 4.7 GA?

[Rob Crittenden]

I want to take the pulse of opinion on 4.7 readiness. CI seems to
looking pretty good and we have most of our goals reached.

There are a number of interesting UI translation-related PRs still
outstanding. Do we want to try to get these in or wait for 4.7.1?

* https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2157
* https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2151
* https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2110
* https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2109

We'll never be "done" but I think 4.7 is stable enough to call it done
and begin work on 4.7.1 in the next few days.

rob

[Christian Heimes]

On 2018-07-17 17:37, Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-devel wrote:
>  I want to take the pulse of opinion on 4.7 readiness. CI seems to
>  looking pretty good and we have most of our goals reached.
>  
>  There are a number of interesting UI translation-related PRs still
>  outstanding. Do we want to try to get these in or wait for 4.7.1?
>  
>  * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2157
>  * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2151
>  * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2110
>  * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2109
>  
>  We'll never be "done" but I think 4.7 is stable enough to call it done
>  and begin work on 4.7.1 in the next few days. 
+1

https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2160 is also of interested.
PR-CI is currently failing for it.


-- 
Christian Heimes
Senior Software Engineer, Identity Management and Platform Security

Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael
O'Neill, Eric Shander

[Alexander Bokovoy]

On ti, 17 heinä 2018, Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-devel wrote:
> I want to take the pulse of opinion on 4.7 readiness. CI seems to
> looking pretty good and we have most of our goals reached.
>
> There are a number of interesting UI translation-related PRs still
> outstanding. Do we want to try to get these in or wait for 4.7.1?
>
> * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2157
> * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2151
> * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2110
> * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2109
>
> We'll never be "done" but I think 4.7 is stable enough to call it done
> and begin work on 4.7.1 in the next few days. 
I'd love to get at least
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2072
because it defines a base for all other localization patches currently
being reviewed. It is ACKed too, I tested it with Russian translation.

PR#2157 from your list is good too.
PR#2109 is good but I haven't run it through my test environment.

I guess we can defer 2157, 2151, 2110, 2109 to 4.7.1. We'll have to do
4.7.1 work soon anyway as SSSD guys acked my one-way shared secret
trust changes and we'll need to coordinate releases.

-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland

[Rob Crittenden]

Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>  On ti, 17 heinä 2018, Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-devel wrote:
> > I want to take the pulse of opinion on 4.7 readiness. CI seems to
> > looking pretty good and we have most of our goals reached.
> >
> > There are a number of interesting UI translation-related PRs still
> > outstanding. Do we want to try to get these in or wait for 4.7.1?
> >
> > * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2157
> > * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2151
> > * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2110
> > * https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2109
> >
> > We'll never be "done" but I think 4.7 is stable enough to call it done
> > and begin work on 4.7.1 in the next few days.
>  I'd love to get at least https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2072
>  because it defines a base for all other localization patches currently
>  being reviewed. It is ACKed too, I tested it with Russian translation. 
Pushed.

>  
>  PR#2157 from your list is good too. 
Needs a rebase and an ack

>  PR#2109 is good but I haven't run it through my test environment.
Ditto.

>  I guess we can defer 2157, 2151, 2110, 2109 to 4.7.1. We'll have
> to do
>  4.7.1 work soon anyway as SSSD guys acked my one-way shared secret
>  trust changes and we'll need to coordinate releases. 
Ok. I think we should cut it this week one way or another.

rob