https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192742
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Batts <vbatts(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #1)
BTW that DW_AT_name should not be there at all for such
DW_TAG_reference_type, according to DWARF spec:
If a name has been given to the modified type in the source program, then
the corresponding modified type entry has a DW_AT_name attribute whose value
is a null-terminated string containing the modified type name as it appears
in the source program.
so, the following should not reference 'ipp' ?:
<2><86>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
<87> DW_AT_name : ipp
<8b> DW_AT_location : 1 byte block: 9c (DW_OP_call_frame_cfa)
<8d> DW_AT_type : <0x1951b>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.