Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555405
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rpandit(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-20 01:30:29 EST ---
New package review is done. You can ask for cvs request and move forward on
this one.
Thanks,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555638
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-20 01:29:08 EST ---
[+] Build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1933279 - fine
[+] rpmlint - ok
===========================================================================
Spec file rpmlint output (one from bug) :
===========================================================================
Rpmlint Messages:
/tmp/gachLqgbtl/ghc-html.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
/tmp/gachLqgbtl/ghc-html.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignored.
===========================================================================
Pkg rpmlint output (one from bug) :
===========================================================================
Rpmlint Messages:
ghc-html.src: W: strange-permission html-1.0.1.2.tar.gz 0600
ghc-html.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
ghc-html.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Ignored.
===========================================================================
Lint output on koji build rpms:
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Koji build rpm
/tmp/gachLqgbtl/koji4eLOwK/1933280/ghc-html-doc-1.0.1.2-2.fc13.x86_64.rpm
output:
===========================================================================
Rpmlint Messages:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Clean.
===========================================================================
Koji build rpm
/tmp/gachLqgbtl/koji4eLOwK/1933280/ghc-html-prof-1.0.1.2-2.fc13.x86_64.rpm
output:
===========================================================================
Rpmlint Messages:
ghc-html-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-html-devel
ghc-html-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-html-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2/libHShtml-1.0.1.2_p.a
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignored.
===========================================================================
Koji build rpm
/tmp/gachLqgbtl/koji4eLOwK/1933280/ghc-html-1.0.1.2-2.fc13.x86_64.rpm output:
===========================================================================
Rpmlint Messages:
ghc-html.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2/libHShtml-1.0.1.2-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-html.x86_64: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2/libHShtml-1.0.1.2-ghc6.12.1.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignored.
===========================================================================
Koji build rpm
/tmp/gachLqgbtl/koji4eLOwK/1933280/ghc-html-devel-1.0.1.2-2.fc13.x86_64.rpm
output:
===========================================================================
Rpmlint Messages:
ghc-html-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Ignored.
[+] name fine
[+] URL fine
[+] source ok
from srpm (sha1sum)
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ sha1sum html-1.0.1.2.tar.gz
3075f689b29d28229e09a3d2aefa2bfbb008d1da html-1.0.1.2.tar.gz
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ sha1sum ../SOURCES/html-1.0.1.2.tar.gz
3075f689b29d28229e09a3d2aefa2bfbb008d1da ../SOURCES/html-1.0.1.2.tar.gz
[+] spec name fine
[+] license ok (copy present) and source has marking
[+] source tree ok (no binaries present)
[+] archs - fine
[+] spec file legible and in american english
[+] BR's ok
[+] %files ok
[+] folders owned - ok
main
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2
/usr/share/doc/ghc-html-1.0.1.2
devel
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2/Text
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/html-1.0.1.2/Text/Html
doc
/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/html-1.0.1.2
[+] source builds fine on fedora ghc archs
[+] no bundled dependencies
[+] %clean section ok
[+] filenames - ok (valid)
[+] profiling ok
[+] lib goes to %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}
[+] new macros
APPROVED
Thanks,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554926
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555638
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555638
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |rpandit(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554926
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |rpandit(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556727
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556727
--- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-20 01:03:26 EST ---
[-] Build - not done - need ghc-regex-base & ghc-regex-posix imported - but
tested on two of primary arch machines i686 and x86_64 using approved
ghc-regex-base & ghc-regex-posix rpm
sudo yum -y --nogpgcheck localinstall
../RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-posix-devel-0.94.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
../RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-posix-doc-0.94.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
../RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-posix-prof-0.94.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
../RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-posix-0.94.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
[x] rpmlint - ok
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-regex-compat-0.92-2.fc13.src.rpm
ghc-regex-compat.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US Haskell
ghc-regex-compat.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US posix
ghc-regex-compat.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
ghc-regex-compat.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Ignored.
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-compat-0.92-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-regex-compat.i686: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US Haskell
ghc-regex-compat.i686: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US posix
ghc-regex-compat.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/regex-compat-0.92/libHSregex-compat-0.92-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-regex-compat.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/regex-compat-0.92/libHSregex-compat-0.92-ghc6.12.1.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Ignored.
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-compat-devel-0.92-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-regex-compat-devel.i686: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US Haskell
ghc-regex-compat-devel.i686: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US posix
ghc-regex-compat-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Ignored.
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-compat-doc-0.92-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-regex-compat-doc.i686: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US Haskell
ghc-regex-compat-doc.i686: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US posix
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignored.
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-regex-compat-prof-0.92-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-regex-compat-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-regex-compat-devel
ghc-regex-compat-prof.i686: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US Haskell
ghc-regex-compat-prof.i686: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US posix
ghc-regex-compat-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
ghc-regex-compat-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/regex-compat-0.92/libHSregex-compat-0.92_p.a
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
Ignored.
[x] name fine
[x] URL fine
[x] source ok
from srpm (sha1sum)
[x] spec name fine
[x] license ok (copy present) and source has marking
[x] source tree ok (no binaries present)
[x] archs - fine
[x] spec file legible and in american english
[x] BR's ok
[x] %files ok
[x] folders owned - ok
main
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/regex-compat-0.92
/usr/share/doc/ghc-regex-compat-0.92
devel
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/regex-compat-0.92
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/regex-compat-0.92/Text
doc
/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/regex-compat-0.92
[x] source builds fine on fedora ghc archs
[x] no bundled dependencies
[x] %clean section ok
[x] filenames - ok (valid)
[x] profiling ok
[x] lib goes to %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}
[x] new macros
APPROVED
Do import both base and posix packages before importing this one.
Thanks,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556727
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.