November 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] Fwd: HCAR November 2010

by Jens Petersen

[Haskell Communities and Activities Report] FYI: I tried to capture the main highlights for the last six months and F14. Forgive me if I forgot anyone and anything. If you have corrections let me know - it might still be possible to make minor changes perhaps. I will try to post a draft earlier next time though our docs-beat is a good starting point also to contribute. Thanks, Jens ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jens Petersen <petersen(a)haskell.org> Date: 2 November 2010 00:04 Subject: Re: HCAR November 2010 To: Janis Voigtlaender <hcar(a)haskell.org> Hi Janis, Here is the Fedora Haskell SIG HCAR report. Thanks, Jens

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629145] Review Request: ghc-cmdargs - Haskell command argument parsing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> 2010-11-01 09:36:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > The Haskell Guidelines > > > should state this clearly, though they were written *before* ghc-6.12 > > > which introduced shared lib support on linux. > > > > So there's an agreed exception here with the packaging committee? > > Well yes: it has been like this forever for ghc. > Static libraries are still the default for ghc. > > I think > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell#Static_vs._Dynamic_Linking is > supposed to imply this but unfortunately it doesn't read well. :-( OK, looks reasonable (I don't think I found that previously). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] Taking ownership of haddock

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

----- lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com wrote: > I intend to take ownership of haddock package. It is required for one other package (leksah, an IDE for Haskell) that I am planning to submit. Yes, I think that is fine. You will need to submit haddock for package review since it has been retired from Fedora for a while and then after approval - you can make SCM Change Request to take ownership of the retired package. Jens

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648145] New: darcs-2.5 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: darcs-2.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648145 Summary: darcs-2.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.5 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.4.99.1 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/darcs/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] please test ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.9.1-8.fc14

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Hi, Current F14 updates ghc-xmonad-contrib has a broken dependency [due to the releng rebuilds and insufficent testing :-( ]. Ben built an update which is in updates-testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.9.1-8.fc14 If people could please test it and give it karma so we can get it pushed asap (F14 will be released in the next day or so), that would be good. Thanks, Jens ps F15 should get ghc package hash metadata, which should prevent this kind of problem from reoccurring in the future.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 634037] Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 Bug 634037 depends on bug 595603, which changed state. Bug 595603 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-10-31 22:22:40 EDT --- ping? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648147] New: ghc-mmap-0.5.7 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-mmap-0.5.7 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648147 Summary: ghc-mmap-0.5.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc-mmap AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.5.7 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.5.6 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mmap/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 641561] New: ghc-dataenc-0.13.0.4 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-dataenc-0.13.0.4 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641561 Summary: ghc-dataenc-0.13.0.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc-dataenc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.13.0.4 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.13.0.3 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/dataenc/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648148] New: ghc-text-0.10.0.0 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-text-0.10.0.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648148 Summary: ghc-text-0.10.0.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc-text AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.10.0.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.8.1.0 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/text/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629145] Review Request: ghc-cmdargs - Haskell command argument parsing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-10-31 20:29:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > > The Haskell Guidelines > > should state this clearly, though they were written *before* ghc-6.12 > > which introduced shared lib support on linux. > > So there's an agreed exception here with the packaging committee? Well yes: it has been like this forever for ghc. Static libraries are still the default for ghc. I think http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell#Static_vs._Dynamic_Linking is supposed to imply this but unfortunately it doesn't read well. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel November 2010