November 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 629145] Review Request: ghc-cmdargs - Haskell command argument parsing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Flag| |needinfo?(mathstuf(a)gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-28 23:00:59 EST --- Packages now built in koji. It would be good to push them to Bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

> The only remaining pending rebuilds I am aware > of now are xmobar and hedgewars (which Bruno is working on). Ok, I missed one more: ghc-feldspar-language, which like xmobar also seems to need a little work for ghc7.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

----- "John Reiser" <jreiser(a)bitwagon.com> wrote: > How can this testing take place when a very long list of dependencies > has not yet appeared in rawhide? Well I meant after the rebuilds were completed, but the majority of the packages had already been rebuilt at the time of writing. Which one was interrupting you testing? :) > A sample (6 of *hundreds*): Mathstuf, Lakshmi, and I have now rebuilt nearly all (15) of the remaining packages. The only remaining pending rebuilds I am aware of now are xmobar and hedgewars (which Bruno is working on). > I don't understand the reasoning for top-down > dribbling, particularly when the same subset of packagers is > responsible for the entire suite. Not sure what you are talking about. Obviously it is impossible to rebuild top-down. Anyway sorry for the rawhide report noise, hope it didn't spoil your weekend too much. :) Jens

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Hi, I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15 (from dist-f15-ghc). The main stacks have been rebuilt: darcs, haskell-platform, xmonad, and gtk2hs. Rebuilds still pending include xmobar, hlint, and various libraries (currently with one or less dependents). Any rawhide package that depends on a Haskell library and hasn't already been rebuilt, must be rebuilt with ghc-7.0.1. You can read more about ghc-7.0.1's new features in the release-notes: http://new-www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.1/html/users_guide/release-7-0-1.... This work is part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GHC70 If you need help with rebuilding a package with ghc-7.0.1 please contact me, #fedora-haskell or haskell-devel list. Testing and feedback of the new packages in rawhide is most welcome in bugzilla or mailing-list. Thanks, Jens

13 years, 5 months

4
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 634048] Haskell Package Reviews Tracker bug

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634048 Bug 634048 depends on bug 657142, which changed state. Bug 657142 Summary: Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 657142] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2010-11-26 05:22:29 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-26 05:22:29 EST --- Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 657142] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-26 02:03:37 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 657142] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-25 20:58:21 EST --- Thank you for the speedy review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-syb Short Description: Scrap Your Boilerplate Owners: petersen Branches: InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 657142] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2010-11-25 09:43:53 EST --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-syb*.rpm ghc-syb.spec ghc-syb.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-syb.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-syb-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-syb-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-syb-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-syb-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-syb-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/syb-0.2.2/libHSsyb-0.2.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK, BSD No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK %clean is ignored - present anyway. OK Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, present in devel package [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . License BSD, mentioned in cabal and source files. [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. [~]md5sum syb-0.2.2.tar.gz 34cb1911dd3efc05eb23b68ac82b6621 syb-0.2.2.tar.gz [~/Downloads]md5sum syb-0.2.2.tar.gz 34cb1911dd3efc05eb23b68ac82b6621 ~/Downloads/syb-0.2.2.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on i686 and x86_64 [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro [NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Validated with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Developer documentation in -devel package. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} [NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. Validated with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the package.Went fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 657142] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel November 2010