June 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell hardware description library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-29 10:42:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 Short Description: A Hardware description library for Haskell Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell hardware description library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 --- Comment #26 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-29 10:36:57 EDT --- Applied patch. Tested fine! Latest at: SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-6.f... Successful Koji builds for F-14 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2280676 F-13 build fails at: No Package Found for ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.7.0 $ rpmlint ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-6.fc14.src.rpm ghc-chalmers-lava2000.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Harrell, Rathskeller, Hastily 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-6.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-chalmers-lava2000.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Harrell, Rathskeller, Hastily ghc-chalmers-lava2000.i686: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.2/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-ghc6.12.2.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: hslogger - |Review Request: |Logging framework |ghc-hslogger - Haskell | |logging framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595603] Review Request: hslogger - Logging framework

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com Status Whiteboard| |Ready --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-29 10:03:53 EDT --- Basically looks fine. Would appreciate if you could update to cabal2spec-0.22.1 from rawhide, sorry. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7809 It also requires latest ghc-rpm-macros to build - planning to push those shortly to F13 updates too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell hardware description library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-29 09:41:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=427684) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=427684) ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec-2.patch Update packaging to latest improved macros. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2280598 Please apply before importing into cvs or building at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell hardware description library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-29 09:33:41 EDT --- Sorry, finally getting back to this now after rebuilding all the packages for ghc-6.12.3... Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output ghc-chalmers-lava2000.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-chalmers-lava2000.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-chalmers-lava2000.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-ghc6.12.1.so (fixed with latest macros) ghc-chalmers-lava2000.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-ghc6.12.1.so (waived) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ghc-chalmers-lava2000-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-chalmers-lava2000-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-chalmers-lava2000-devel (waived) ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-chalmers-lava2000-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1/libHSchalmers-lava2000-1.1.1_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines But please contact the author to request adding headers to the source files. [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release cf8c388bd905a57221169b54a4b4454e chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

----- "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote: > > > Probably kaya and hedgewars should be rebuilt too. > > > > I'll bump hedgewars once the update shows up. > > I am not seeing a conflict with hedgewars after the update. So for now > at least, I don't think hedgewars needs to be rebuilt. Right, there shouldn't be any conflict since ghc links statically by default (dynlinking is still considered experimental upstream though it may become default for Linux in 6.14 perhaps). I just suggested the rebuilds as best practice. :) And to avoid future FTBFS bugs, etc. :) > None of the ghc related requires (ghc-dataenc, ghc-network, ghc-stm, > ghc-utf8-string) were version specific. Does that indicate that the > requires > were set up improperly or just that these packages didn't have an abi > change? You should not need those Requires since they are for shared libs. Rpm would generate them for you automatically: so they should be redundant. You could pass "-dynamic" to ghc if you want to link to the shared libraries. Thanks, Jens ps Note also that ghc-utf8-string is also available and preferred in F13 now.

13 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

I built ghc-6.12.3 for F14. This will require rebuilding all ghc library packages, which I and the Haskell SIG will be doing over the coming days - the meantime please bear with us with the broken dependencies... Thanks, Jens

13 years, 10 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595297] New: hlint-1.6.21 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: hlint-1.6.21 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595297 Summary: hlint-1.6.21 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: hlint AssignedTo: konrad(a)tylerc.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: konrad(a)tylerc.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.6.21 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.6.20 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hlint/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 595295] New: ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595295 Summary: ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc-haskell-src-exts AssignedTo: konrad(a)tylerc.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: konrad(a)tylerc.org, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.9.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.8.2 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskell-src-exts/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel June 2010