haskell-devel June 2012

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
305 discussions

[Bug 827976] New: ghc-http-types-0.6.11 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827976 Bug ID: 827976 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Summary: ghc-http-types-0.6.11 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: ghc-http-types Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.6.11 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.6.10 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/http-types/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 821385] New: ghc-haskeline-0.6.4.7 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-haskeline-0.6.4.7 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821385 Summary: ghc-haskeline-0.6.4.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-haskeline AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Latest upstream release: 0.6.4.7 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.6.4.6 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskeline/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 827974] New: ghc-gtksourceview2-0.12.3.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827974 Bug ID: 827974 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Summary: ghc-gtksourceview2-0.12.3.1 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: ghc-gtksourceview2 Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.12.3.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.3 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/gtksourceview2/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 827973] New: ghc-glib-0.12.3.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827973 Bug ID: 827973 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Summary: ghc-glib-0.12.3.1 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: ghc-glib Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.12.3.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.3 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/glib/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 815297] ghc-cryptohash-0.7.5 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815297 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2012-06-18 00:22:48 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325799 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 827972] New: ghc-cairo-0.12.3.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827972 Bug ID: 827972 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Summary: ghc-cairo-0.12.3.1 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: ghc-cairo Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.12.3.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.3 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cairo/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 814637] ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator-0.2.0.4 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814637 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2012-06-18 00:18:40 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325659 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818898] ghc-blaze-builder-conduit-0.4.0.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818898 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2012-06-18 00:17:17 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325769 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 662275] Review Request: hledger - A double-entry accounting tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jun '12

17 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662275 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. pmlint -i ghc-hledger-0.17-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ghc-hledger-devel-0.17-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm hledger-0.17-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm hledger-0.17-1.fc17.src.rpm ../hledger.spec ghc-hledger.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hledger-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. hledger.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C hledger The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. hledger.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. hledger.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hledger Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. hledger.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C hledger The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. hledger.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. hledger.src: W: strange-permission hledger-0.17.tar.gz 0640L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. GPLv3 [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum hledger-0.17.tar.gz hledger-0.17-1.fc18.src/hledger-0.17.tar.gz b4d62425535906232932adbee1e0843f hledger-0.17.tar.gz b4d62425535906232932adbee1e0843f hledger-0.17-1.fc18.src/hledger-0.17.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-hledger error: Failed dependencies: ghc(hledger-0.17) = 9425660feecb08de493b26ba3d6d53c9 is needed by (installed) ghc-hledger-devel-0.17-1.fc17.x86_64 ghc-hledger = 0.17-1.fc17 is needed by (installed) ghc-hledger-devel-0.17-1.fc17.x86_64 [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Loaded Hledger.Cli.Add into ghci. Loads fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 830159] Review Request: ghc-smallcheck - A testing library to verify properties of test cases
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jun '12

17 Jun '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830159 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ghc-smallcheck-devel-0.6.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-smallcheck.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum smallcheck-0.6.1.tar.gz 133eaace073cfd563763434b34740409 smallcheck-0.6.1.tar.gz md5sum ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc16.src/smallcheck-0.6.1.tar.gz 133eaace073cfd563763434b34740409 ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc16.src/smallcheck-0.6.1.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Check with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-smallcheck-0.6.1-1.fc16.x86_64 error: Failed dependencies: ghc(smallcheck-0.6.1) = ed6f7ca146324b674ceaca74520bc77e is needed by (installed) ghc-smallcheck-devel-0.6.1-1.fc16.x86_64 ghc-smallcheck = 0.6.1-1.fc16 is needed by (installed) ghc-smallcheck-devel-0.6.1-1.fc16.x86_64 [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Loaded Test.SmallCheck into ghci. Loads fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
31
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel June 2012