June 2012 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 828781] Review Request: ghc-logict - A continuation-based, backtracking, logic programming monad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 827675] Review Request: ghc-netlist-to-vhdl - Convert a Netlist AST to VHDL

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827675 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-netlist-to-vhdl-0.3.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 829727] Review Request: ghc-lazysmallcheck - Library for demand driven testing of Haskell programs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829727 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 829727] Review Request: ghc-lazysmallcheck - Library for demand driven testing of Haskell programs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829727 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks for the review. Will update the description before pushing the package. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-lazysmallcheck Short Description: A library for demand-driven testing of Haskell programs Owners: shakthimaan Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 829727] Review Request: ghc-lazysmallcheck - Library for demand driven testing of Haskell programs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829727 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.src.rpm ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ghc-lazysmallcheck-devel-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-lazysmallcheck.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK API documentation - OK, in devel packages [+]MUST : Summary and description [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . License is BSD [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum lazysmallcheck-0.6.tar.gz 9a1f815146ac7934518154f1f3a3620c lazysmallcheck-0.6.tar.gz md5sum ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.src/lazysmallcheck-0.6.tar.gz 9a1f815146ac7934518154f1f3a3620c ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.src/lazysmallcheck-0.6.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64 [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR. [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64 error: Failed dependencies: ghc(lazysmallcheck-0.6) = f4bafa6be17c01ffed218211055abfce is needed by (installed) ghc-lazysmallcheck-devel-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64 ghc-lazysmallcheck = 0.6-1.fc16 is needed by (installed) ghc-lazysmallcheck-devel-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64 [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Loaded Test.LazySmallCheck into ghci. Loads fine. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. rpm qi on the devel package gives "A lazysmallcheck library for Haskell" as the description. I think it is better to put the description in %common_description so that it is used in both base and devel packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 829727] Review Request: ghc-lazysmallcheck - Library for demand driven testing of Haskell programs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829727 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 829727] Review Request: ghc-lazysmallcheck - Library for demand driven testing of Haskell programs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829727 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 829727] Review Request: ghc-lazysmallcheck - Library for demand driven testing of Haskell programs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829727 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- $ rpmlint ghc-lazysmallcheck.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-lazysmallcheck-devel-0.6-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F16, F17, F18 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4135980 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4135981 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4135982 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828781] Review Request: ghc-logict - A continuation-based, backtracking, logic programming monad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828781] Review Request: ghc-logict - A continuation-based, backtracking, logic programming monad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-2.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel June 2012