haskell-devel September 2014

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
329 discussions

[Bug 1135867] Review Request: ghc-stm-chans - Additional types of channels for STM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Sep '14

17 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135867 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WY8PcC3EzO&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 987349] New: ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.12 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987349 Bug ID: 987349 Summary: ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-simple-sendfile Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.2.12 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.2.11-2.fc20 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/simple-sendfile/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dfdAsXGBHP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 1135867] Review Request: ghc-stm-chans - Additional types of channels for STM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135867 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-stm-chans Short Description: Additional types of channels for STM Upstream URL: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/stm-chans Owners: petersen codeblock Branches: f21 f20 f19 epel7 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g96yBe6lNG&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1135867] Review Request: ghc-stm-chans - Additional types of channels for STM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135867 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- Looks fine to me. APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 471040 bytes in 31 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Haskell: [x]: This should never happen - Okey dokey ;) ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [-]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-stm-chans-3.0.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-stm-chans-devel-3.0.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-stm-chans-3.0.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm ghc-stm-chans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US closeable -> close able, close-able, seasonable ghc-stm-chans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US closeable -> close able, close-able, seasonable 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-stm-chans-devel ghc-stm-chans ghc-stm-chans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US closeable -> close able, close-able, seasonable 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-stm-chans-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(stm-chans-3.0.0.2-99e75125f5408ab2c90f185e46b809e7) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-devel(stm-2.4.2-b5d718b1a5f1fbcdb61a336aef0c2130) ghc-stm-chans(x86-64) ghc-stm-chans (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(stm-2.4.2-b5d718b1a5f1fbcdb61a336aef0c2130) libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSstm-2.4.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- ghc-stm-chans-devel: ghc-devel(stm-chans-3.0.0.2-99e75125f5408ab2c90f185e46b809e7) ghc-stm-chans-devel ghc-stm-chans-devel(x86-64) ghc-stm-chans-static ghc-stm-chans: ghc(stm-chans-3.0.0.2-99e75125f5408ab2c90f185e46b809e7) ghc-stm-chans ghc-stm-chans(x86-64) libHSstm-chans-3.0.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-stm-chans: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/stm-chans-3.0.0.2/libHSstm-chans-3.0.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/package/stm-chans-3.0.0.2/stm-chans-3.0.0.2.tar.… : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d07abf7a8bf9689b92f69bb73e9c1b71dc785d7b0a7b512dc24d77e945024aff CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d07abf7a8bf9689b92f69bb73e9c1b71dc785d7b0a7b512dc24d77e945024aff Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1135867 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Haskell, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mgK8sIE9ZU&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1135867] Review Request: ghc-stm-chans - Additional types of channels for STM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135867 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |relrod(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |relrod(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tANHtBH33a&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1135933] Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - Monad classes using type families
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135933 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qXphKFLSaN&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1074892] New: ghc-ltk-0.13.1.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074892 Bug ID: 1074892 Summary: ghc-ltk-0.13.1.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-ltk Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.13.1.0 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.1.0-11.fc21 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/ltk Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VBq2TDQ6hW&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 1135874] Review Request: ghc-monad-loops - Monadic loops
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135874 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks for the review New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-monad-loops Short Description: Monadic loops Upstream URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/monad-loops Owners: petersen codeblock Branches: f21 f20 f19 epel7 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Lck90opIHM&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1135906] Review Request: ghc-http-date - HTTP Date parser and formatter
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135906 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks for the review New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-http-date Short Description: HTTP Date parser and formatter Upstream URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-date Owners: petersen codeblock Branches: f21 f20 f19 epel7 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=akBjkzVjpN&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1135933] Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - Monad classes using type families
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135933 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.2-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LxEYThpLSk&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

← Newer
1
...
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2014