September 2015 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1256054] Review Request: ghc-network-uri - URI manipulation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256054 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5Dzwc8Iz53&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1256054] Review Request: ghc-network-uri - URI manipulation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256054 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- I opened https://github.com/haskell/network-uri/pull/20 for the typo in the description. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: ======= - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/petersen/pkgreview/1256054-ghc- network-uri/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 389120 bytes in 17 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-network-uri-2.6.0.3-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm ghc-network-uri-devel-2.6.0.3-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm ghc-network-uri-2.6.0.3-1.fc24.src.rpm ghc-network-uri.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US inteface -> interface, interlace ghc-network-uri.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US inteface -> interface, interlace ghc-network-uri.src: W: strange-permission network-uri-2.6.0.3.tar.gz 640 ghc-network-uri.src: W: strange-permission ghc-network-uri.spec 640 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory <pardon?> ghc-network-uri.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/network-uri-2.6.0.3/libHSnetwork-uri-2.6.0.3-ghc7.8.4.so libHSnetwork-uri-2.6.0.3-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Requires -------- ghc-network-uri (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.7.0.2-cb23b5265b6e147094c0cd9ac819acb1) ghc(deepseq-1.3.0.2-0ddc77716bd2515426e1ba39f6788a4f) ghc(parsec-3.1.5-51b006adec60c0312a6076337b4afd53) libHSarray-0.5.0.0-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.7.0.2-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.10.4.0-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.2-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.1.0-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.1.0-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSmtl-2.1.3.1-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHSparsec-3.1.5-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHStext-1.1.1.3-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ghc-network-uri-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(network-uri-2.6.0.3-9a1d552c2e26679ad23f44229b6acd19) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.7.0.2-cb23b5265b6e147094c0cd9ac819acb1) ghc-devel(deepseq-1.3.0.2-0ddc77716bd2515426e1ba39f6788a4f) ghc-devel(parsec-3.1.5-51b006adec60c0312a6076337b4afd53) ghc-network-uri(x86-64) Provides -------- ghc-network-uri: ghc(network-uri-2.6.0.3-9a1d552c2e26679ad23f44229b6acd19) ghc-network-uri ghc-network-uri(x86-64) libHSnetwork-uri-2.6.0.3-ghc7.8.4.so()(64bit) ghc-network-uri-devel: ghc-devel(network-uri-2.6.0.3-9a1d552c2e26679ad23f44229b6acd19) ghc-network-uri-devel ghc-network-uri-devel(x86-64) ghc-network-uri-static Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-network-uri: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/network-uri-2.6.0.3/libHSnetwork-uri-2.6.0.3-ghc7.8.4.so Source checksums ---------------- https://hackage.haskell.org/package/network-uri-2.6.0.3/network-uri-2.6.0... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 0fc2cdff47ca77d826ebeb5cabe6ddac2333ca1504b2b629dd369399c5c28bdf CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0fc2cdff47ca77d826ebeb5cabe6ddac2333ca1504b2b629dd369399c5c28bdf Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1256054 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Haskell, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=50dKTFdGK2&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Just for the record I tried to backport to 0.12.5 for F21 and EPEL7 but the build fails (with ghc-7.6.3 stack) like this: [117 of 198] Compiling Graphics.UI.Gtk.Multiline.TextTagTable ( dist/build/Graphics/UI/Gtk/Multiline/TextTagTable.hs, dist/build/Graphics/UI/Gtk/Multiline/TextTagTable.o ) Graphics/UI/Gtk/Multiline/TextTagTable.chs:88:3: Couldn't match type `CInt' with `()' Expected type: IO () Actual type: IO CInt In the return type of a call of `\ (TextTagTable arg1) (TextTag arg2) -> withForeignPtr arg1 $ \ argPtr1 -> withForeignPtr arg2 $ \ argPtr2 -> ...' In the expression: (\ (TextTagTable arg1) (TextTag arg2) -> withForeignPtr arg1 $ \ argPtr1 -> withForeignPtr arg2 $ \ argPtr2 -> gtk_text_tag_table_add argPtr1 argPtr2) (toTextTagTable self) (toTextTag tag) In an equation for `textTagTableAdd': textTagTableAdd self tag = (\ (TextTagTable arg1) (TextTag arg2) -> withForeignPtr arg1 $ \ argPtr1 -> withForeignPtr arg2 $ \ argPtr2 -> ...) (toTextTagTable self) (toTextTag tag) Also tried latest current gtk2hs-buildtools but that doesn't help. I guess it is an issue with ghc-7.6 probably. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PpvHIKhdkj&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1260064] Review Request: ghc-webkitgtk3 - Binding to the Webkit library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260064 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q1gWHq0bu5&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-gtk3-0.14.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-gtk3'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14938 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DlBvX4t4UM&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-gtk3-0.14.1-1.fc22, gtk2hs-buildtools-0.13.0.4-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-gtk3 gtk2hs-buildtools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14925 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a22WxdkBfA&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1239527] New: ghc-webkit: FTBFS in rawhide

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239527 Bug ID: 1239527 Summary: ghc-webkit: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-webkit Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1239338 (F23FTBFS) Your package ghc-webkit failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10091811 For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239338 [Bug 1239338] Fedora 23 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j6cJkvOtgG&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1255737] New: ghc-vector hash issues on aarch64

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255737 Bug ID: 1255737 Summary: ghc-vector hash issues on aarch64 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-vector Priority: high Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbrobinson(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Blocks: 922257 (ARM64,F-ExcludeArch-aarch64) It was thought that rebuilding ghc-vector would fix the hash issues on aarch64. It appears not. DEBUG util.py:378: Getting requirements for gtk2hs-buildtools-0.13.0.4-1.fc23.src DEBUG util.py:378: --> alex-3.1.4-2.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-Cabal-devel-1.18.1.5-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-array-devel-0.5.0.0-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-containers-devel-0.5.5.1-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-directory-devel-1.2.1.0-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-filepath-devel-1.3.0.2-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-hashtables-devel-1.1.2.1-2.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-pretty-devel-1.1.1.1-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-process-devel-1.2.0.0-46.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-random-devel-1.0.1.1-30.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-3.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: --> happy-1.19.5-3.fc23.aarch64 DEBUG util.py:378: Error: Package: ghc-hashtables-1.1.2.1-2.fc23.aarch64 (build) DEBUG util.py:378: Requires: ghc(vector-0.10.9.1-141b8608a457666e762b17e65827314c) DEBUG util.py:378: Error: Package: ghc-hashtables-devel-1.1.2.1-2.fc23.aarch64 (build) DEBUG util.py:378: Requires: ghc-devel(vector-0.10.9.1-141b8608a457666e762b17e65827314c) DEBUG util.py:378: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:378: You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922257 [Bug 922257] Tracker for ARM64 support -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HYly9Y0XxT&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 974725] Review Request: ghc-pretty-show - Tools for working with derived Show instances and generic inspection of values

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974725 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- You forgot to upload the new spec file, which confuses fedora-review. You have an extra copy of LICENSE in %doc: please drop that when importing. For that you need to add "rm %{buildroot}%{ghc_pkgdocdir}/LICENSE" unfortunately. (Ideally --licensedir support should be added to Cabal.) Otherwise it looks good to me now. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NKsr5RPtJV&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-gtk3-0.14.1-1.fc22 gtk2hs-buildtools-0.13.0.4-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14925 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aLd6my5RZl&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2015