haskell-devel October 2017

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
191 discussions

[Bug 925993] Review Request: ghc-yesod-core - Yesod core library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925993 --- Comment #7 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> --- clientsession is now available in Rawhide if you can update this. This review is for an outdated version at the moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198196] Review Request: ghc-auto-update - Efficiently run periodic, on-demand actions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198196 Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> --- This package is outdated. Please update to the latest release. Also, the description should be updated with something reasonable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1498410] Review Request: ghc-hxt-unicode - Unicode en-/ decoding functions for utf8, iso-latin-* and other encodings
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498410 Bug 1498410 depends on bug 1491632, which changed state. Bug 1491632 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hxt-charproperties - Character properties and classes for XML and Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491632 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1498400] Review Request: ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema - A regular expression library for W3C XML Schema regular expressions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498400 Bug 1498400 depends on bug 1491632, which changed state. Bug 1491632 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hxt-charproperties - Character properties and classes for XML and Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491632 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1491632] Review Request: ghc-hxt-charproperties - Character properties and classes for XML and Unicode
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491632 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2017-10-04 10:20:04 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-hxt-charproperties-9.2.0.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1498410] Review Request: ghc-hxt-unicode - Unicode en-/ decoding functions for utf8, iso-latin-* and other encodings
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498410 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Package accepted. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-hxt-unicode/review-ghc-hxt- unicode/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 163840 bytes in 20 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-hxt-unicode-9.0.2.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm ghc-hxt-unicode-devel-9.0.2.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm ghc-hxt-unicode-9.0.2.4-1.fc28.src.rpm ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iso -> ISO, is, so ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) latin -> Latin, lain, satin ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) encodings -> encoding, encoding s, recordings ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iso -> ISO, is, so ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US latin -> Latin, lain, satin ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US somes -> domes, some, sames ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US encodings -> encoding, encoding s, recordings ghc-hxt-unicode.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iso -> ISO, is, so ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) latin -> Latin, lain, satin ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) encodings -> encoding, encoding s, recordings ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iso -> ISO, is, so ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US latin -> Latin, lain, satin ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US somes -> domes, some, sames ghc-hxt-unicode.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US encodings -> encoding, encoding s, recordings 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1498400] Review Request: ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema - A regular expression library for W3C XML Schema regular expressions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498400 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Package accepted. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema/review-ghc-hxt- regex-xmlschema/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 563200 bytes in 34 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema-9.2.0.3-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema-devel-9.2.0.3-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema-9.2.0.3-2.fc28.src.rpm ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US regexs -> regex, regexps, regex's ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exor -> xor, e xor, ex or ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subexpressions -> sub expressions, sub-expressions, expressionless ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tokenizers -> tokenism ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US regexs -> regex, regexps, regex's ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exor -> xor, e xor, ex or ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subexpressions -> sub expressions, sub-expressions, expressionless ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tokenizers -> tokenism 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1491632] Review Request: ghc-hxt-charproperties - Character properties and classes for XML and Unicode
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491632 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1498410 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498410 [Bug 1498410] Review Request: ghc-hxt-unicode - Unicode en-/decoding functions for utf8, iso-latin-* and other encodings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1498410] Review Request: ghc-hxt-unicode - Unicode en-/ decoding functions for utf8, iso-latin-* and other encodings
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498410 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org Depends On| |1491632 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491632 [Bug 1491632] Review Request: ghc-hxt-charproperties - Character properties and classes for XML and Unicode -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1491632] Review Request: ghc-hxt-charproperties - Character properties and classes for XML and Unicode
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '17

04 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491632 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1498400 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498400 [Bug 1498400] Review Request: ghc-hxt-regex-xmlschema - A regular expression library for W3C XML Schema regular expressions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel October 2017