May 2009 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-09 04:01:39 EDT --- Hmm, I still don't see the point in shipping this package on archs without ghc builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #9 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-09 02:16:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Makes this noarch. Otherwise, patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC and Haskell Platform

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

----- "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos(a)serpentine.com> wrote: > Now that the first Haskell Platform release is out, we'll have to retool our Haskell packaging to handle it. Fun! :-\ : > The thing that's tricky is that the Platform is a combination of libraries and tools, combining the old "extralibs" GHC tarball with several libraries and tools that we already package. Yep, I think we can do it all with a haskell-platform package that requires all the right bits. For the first cut we can do the deps by hand, but we really need cabal2spec to calculate the deps and versions for us automatically or it will be too error prone in the long run. I may try to take an initial stab at it over the weekend. The alternative might still be just to ship the whole haskell-platform tarball and deprecate the packages that it obsoletes, though it is a bit wasteful in terms of rebuilds and updates though less burden to maintain perhaps. Do we still really need still ghc-extralibs? I thought the platform more or less replaces that. Perhaps any necessary missing packages could just be separated into new packages on a needed basis. Jens

15 years

2
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-07 23:39:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342976) ghc-rpm-macros-4.patch Need %setup to actually build within a dir (ie when overriding ~/rpmbuild/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-07 22:00:49 EDT --- Ok looks good to me now. I think I forgot to mention yesterday that I was also thinking we should only ship this on archs with ghc. (In principle we might also want arch specific macros (eg to work around ppc breakage for example;) at some point.) So I am inclined to do -BuildArch: noarch +# fedora ghc archs: +ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-06 23:44:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Renames LICENSE back to COPYING, and removes extra comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-06 23:43:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-.fc10.src.rpm Renames LICENSE back to COPYING, and removes extra comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody@fedoraproj | |ect.org) | AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-06 23:34:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342766) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342766) ghc-rpm-macros.spec-2.patch Basically looks ok now to me but would suggest these small changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel May 2009