haskell-devel April 2014

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
437 discussions

[Bug 1058669] Review Request: ghc-word8 - 8-bit character library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058669 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 286720 bytes in 20 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-word8-0.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-word8-devel-0.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-word8-0.0.4-1.fc20.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-word8-devel ghc-word8 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-word8-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(word8-0.0.4-f496584995b4d81ec7004587d08943d7) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-word8(x86-64) ghc-word8 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- ghc-word8-devel: ghc-devel(word8-0.0.4-f496584995b4d81ec7004587d08943d7) ghc-word8-devel ghc-word8-devel(x86-64) ghc-word8-static ghc-word8: ghc(word8-0.0.4-f496584995b4d81ec7004587d08943d7) ghc-word8 ghc-word8(x86-64) libHSword8-0.0.4-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-word8: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/word8-0.0.4/libHSword8-0.0.4-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/word8/0.0.4/word8-0.0.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 714e9bc17239055d0bc51f78fd87447d129167e8c65bc2f89bce079a99d03ecb CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 714e9bc17239055d0bc51f78fd87447d129167e8c65bc2f89bce079a99d03ecb Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b ghc-word8 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Haskell, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yFb6TuhsS9&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1057479 --- Comment #1 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- Latest hjsmin depends on this. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057479 [Bug 1057479] ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.6 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qKpvEcMCUk&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org Depends On| |1075569 | |(ghc-ansi-wl-pprint) Alias| |ghc-optparse-applicative Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075569 [Bug 1075569] Review Request: ghc-ansi-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer for colored ANSI terminal output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uUN60fXyJ0&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1075569] Review Request: ghc-ansi-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer for colored ANSI terminal output
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075569 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1086444 | |(ghc-optparse-applicative) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 [Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wOmfX0V2l5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1058669] Review Request: ghc-word8 - 8-bit character library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058669 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-word8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YLoM59j7oh&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1058669] Review Request: ghc-word8 - 8-bit character library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058669 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |relrod(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |relrod(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6skkoYJ1Ex&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1019617] New: ghc-utf8-light-0.4.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019617 Bug ID: 1019617 Summary: ghc-utf8-light-0.4.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-utf8-light Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: relrod(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, relrod(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.4.2 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.4.0.1-2.fc20 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/utf8-light Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=c0tpIHjeIV&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 1082515] Review Request: shake - Make-like build system
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082515 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- I'm going to APPROVE this, However: Can you change the %define here to %global: %define cabal_configure_options --enable-tests Also, there are some rpmlint warnings. Most of them (spelling) we can ignore, others would be nice to fix. Can we ask upstream to add a manpage to their next release? And this should be pretty easy I think to fix on import: shake.src: W: strange-permission shake-0.11.4.tar.gz 0600L Review follows: Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Haskell: [x]: This should never happen ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ghc-shake [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define cabal_configure_options --enable-tests [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2744320 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: shake-0.11.4-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-shake-0.11.4-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-shake-devel-0.11.4-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm shake-0.11.4-2.fc20.src.rpm shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, thuggish shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ndmitchell -> Mitchell, Mitchel shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US makefiles -> make files, make-files, filmmakers shake.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shake ghc-shake-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shakeArgs -> Shakespeare shake.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP shake.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, thuggish shake.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ndmitchell -> Mitchell, Mitchel shake.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US makefiles -> make files, make-files, filmmakers shake.src: W: strange-permission shake-0.11.4.tar.gz 0600L 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-shake-devel ghc-shake shake ghc-shake-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shakeArgs -> Shakespeare shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, thuggish shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ndmitchell -> Mitchell, Mitchel shake.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US makefiles -> make files, make-files, filmmakers shake.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shake 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-shake-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(shake-0.11.4-f90a216aa2bb6bd2ae1e02ef63cebd91) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-devel(binary-0.5.1.1-72ed744c57c32286a49da6dda4f660b7) ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) ghc-devel(deepseq-1.3.0.1-5cc4cd89bdc2e8f6db1833d95ec36926) ghc-devel(directory-1.2.0.1-91a788fd88acd7f149f0f10f5f1e23f2) ghc-devel(filepath-1.3.0.1-b12cbe18566fe1532a1fda4c85e31cbe) ghc-devel(hashable-1.1.2.5-e0f2541518f84d3123a819112b4ffe20) ghc-devel(old-time-1.1.0.1-2f8ea093d0c7014780a8a5772f948883) ghc-devel(process-1.1.0.2-76e05340eb66705981411022731ca84a) ghc-devel(random-1.0.1.1-43fdc5da991685d8a0ec8cb553880cf8) ghc-devel(time-1.4.0.1-10dc4804a19dc0000fab79908f1a9f50) ghc-devel(transformers-0.3.0.0-387c76a892254b0b8fe4d66f4780ad17) ghc-devel(unix-2.6.0.1-4f219f792083f70ec440ce406f12ce57) ghc-devel(unordered-containers-0.2.3.0-c7952fe8bed178bdf8ed4d090730c9da) ghc-devel(utf8-string-0.3.7-26a8ed8ca48fe809983bde6faca943a9) ghc-shake(x86-64) ghc-shake (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(binary-0.5.1.1-72ed744c57c32286a49da6dda4f660b7) ghc(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) ghc(deepseq-1.3.0.1-5cc4cd89bdc2e8f6db1833d95ec36926) ghc(directory-1.2.0.1-91a788fd88acd7f149f0f10f5f1e23f2) ghc(filepath-1.3.0.1-b12cbe18566fe1532a1fda4c85e31cbe) ghc(hashable-1.1.2.5-e0f2541518f84d3123a819112b4ffe20) ghc(old-time-1.1.0.1-2f8ea093d0c7014780a8a5772f948883) ghc(process-1.1.0.2-76e05340eb66705981411022731ca84a) ghc(random-1.0.1.1-43fdc5da991685d8a0ec8cb553880cf8) ghc(time-1.4.0.1-10dc4804a19dc0000fab79908f1a9f50) ghc(transformers-0.3.0.0-387c76a892254b0b8fe4d66f4780ad17) ghc(unix-2.6.0.1-4f219f792083f70ec440ce406f12ce57) ghc(unordered-containers-0.2.3.0-c7952fe8bed178bdf8ed4d090730c9da) ghc(utf8-string-0.3.7-26a8ed8ca48fe809983bde6faca943a9) libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbinary-0.5.1.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHScontainers-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdirectory-1.2.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSfilepath-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHShashable-1.1.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSold-locale-1.0.0.5-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSold-time-1.1.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSprocess-1.1.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSrandom-1.0.1.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStime-1.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSunix-2.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSunordered-containers-0.2.3.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSutf8-string-0.3.7-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) shake (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(array-0.4.0.1-3b78425c10ff2dad7acf7e8c8ae014c3) ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(binary-0.5.1.1-72ed744c57c32286a49da6dda4f660b7) ghc(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) ghc(containers-0.5.0.0-ab1dae9a94cd3cc84e7b2805636ebfa2) ghc(deepseq-1.3.0.1-5cc4cd89bdc2e8f6db1833d95ec36926) ghc(directory-1.2.0.1-91a788fd88acd7f149f0f10f5f1e23f2) ghc(filepath-1.3.0.1-b12cbe18566fe1532a1fda4c85e31cbe) ghc(ghc-prim-0.3.0.0-d5221a8c8a269b66ab9a07bdc23317dd) ghc(hashable-1.1.2.5-e0f2541518f84d3123a819112b4ffe20) ghc(integer-gmp-0.5.0.0-2f15426f5b53fe4c6490832f9b20d8d7) ghc(old-locale-1.0.0.5-6729cb9d9cc62d150655de8fc5401b91) ghc(old-time-1.1.0.1-2f8ea093d0c7014780a8a5772f948883) ghc(process-1.1.0.2-76e05340eb66705981411022731ca84a) ghc(random-1.0.1.1-43fdc5da991685d8a0ec8cb553880cf8) ghc(text-0.11.3.1-e38859e86485c167fa7c9441789e7607) ghc(time-1.4.0.1-10dc4804a19dc0000fab79908f1a9f50) ghc(transformers-0.3.0.0-387c76a892254b0b8fe4d66f4780ad17) ghc(unix-2.6.0.1-4f219f792083f70ec440ce406f12ce57) ghc(unordered-containers-0.2.3.0-c7952fe8bed178bdf8ed4d090730c9da) ghc(utf8-string-0.3.7-26a8ed8ca48fe809983bde6faca943a9) libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbinary-0.5.1.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHScontainers-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdirectory-1.2.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSfilepath-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHShashable-1.1.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSold-locale-1.0.0.5-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSold-time-1.1.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSprocess-1.1.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSrandom-1.0.1.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSrts_thr-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStime-1.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSunix-2.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSunordered-containers-0.2.3.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSutf8-string-0.3.7-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libffi.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- ghc-shake-devel: ghc-devel(shake-0.11.4-f90a216aa2bb6bd2ae1e02ef63cebd91) ghc-shake-devel ghc-shake-devel(x86-64) ghc-shake-static ghc-shake: ghc(shake-0.11.4-f90a216aa2bb6bd2ae1e02ef63cebd91) ghc-shake ghc-shake(x86-64) libHSshake-0.11.4-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) shake: shake shake(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-shake: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/shake-0.11.4/libHSshake-0.11.4-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/shake/0.11.4/shake-0.11.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d112f7186bdec4da433e6933eee1581348f802762533ed51711f80e2db3f723e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d112f7186bdec4da433e6933eee1581348f802762533ed51711f80e2db3f723e Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b shake Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Haskell, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tAJtlToCIy&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1069062] Review Request: cabal-install - Command-line interface for Cabal and Hackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069062 Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z4BCMpp8Xq&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1082548] Review Request: ghc-parallel - Parallel programming library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082548 Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |negativo17(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |negativo17(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UWDogSqkTD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel April 2014