Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-01-21 03:38:51 EST --- To clarify again, I think "GPL+" is correct for now. GPL plus BSD = GPL: the library is not dual-licensed so GPL+ is the correct license AFAICT.
(In reply to comment #7)
You're right SHA256.hsc is marked GPL. I actually talked to the author about this and he remarked that he had rewritten the file recently but that does not affect this review...
(Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.)
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org