[Bug 1195231] New: ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Bug ID: 1195231
           Summary: ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 22
         Component: ghc
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],
                    [e-mail],
                    [e-mail]

Description of problem:
ghc-7.8 builds fail towards the end during %install with a terse error:

ghc-cabal: Installed package ID not registered: "ghc-prim-0.3.1.0-inplace"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild on arm64

Actual results:
```
"inplace/bin/ghc-cabal" copy libraries/haskell2010 dist-install "strip"
'/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64' '/usr'
'/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4' '/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries' 'v dyn '
Installing library in
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/haskell2010-1.1.2.0
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc-pkg"
--force --global-package-db
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/package.conf.d"
update rts/dist/package.conf.install
Reading package info from "rts/dist/package.conf.install" ... done.
rts-1.0: Warning: library-dirs: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/rts-1.0 doesn't exist or
isn't a directory
rts-1.0: Warning: include-dirs: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/include doesn't exist or
isn't a directory
rts-1.0: cannot find any of
["libHSrts.a","libHSrts.p_a","libHSrts-ghc7.8.4.so","libHSrts-ghc7.8.4.dylib","HSrts-ghc7.8.4.dll"]
on library path (ignoring)
"inplace/bin/ghc-cabal" register libraries/ghc-prim dist-install
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc"
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc-pkg"
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4"
'/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64' '/usr'
'/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4' '/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries' NO  
Warning: cannot determine version of
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc-pkg
:
""
Registering ghc-prim-0.3.1.0...
"inplace/bin/ghc-cabal" register libraries/integer-gmp dist-install
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc"
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc-pkg"
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4"
'/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64' '/usr'
'/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4' '/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries' NO  
Warning: cannot determine version of
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-7.8.4-39.1.fc22.aarch64/usr/lib64/ghc-7.8.4/bin/ghc-pkg
:
""
ghc-cabal: Installed package ID not registered: "ghc-prim-0.3.1.0-inplace"
make[1]: *** [install_packages] Error 1
ghc.mk:901: recipe for target 'install_packages' failed
Makefile:71: recipe for target 'install' failed
make: *** [install] Error 2
```

Expected results:
complete build

Additional info:
The "cannot determine version of" ghc-pkg warnings look suspicious.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9673 is the original bug I filed
upstream in October ;)

https://github.com/lukexi/ghc-7.8-arm64 may help: though it involves using
llvm-3.5 ;o)  I'll try and give it a try anyway...

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen  ---
Trying backport ghc call convention patch from llvm-3.6 and see if that helps.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen  ---
ghc-7.10 RC2 also fails to install similarly (no ghc-pkg output).

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen  ---
It is strange through, "ghc-pkg --version" seems to work in an
interactive shell but not in an non-interactive subprocess.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen  ---
The current suspicion is that the problem is related to ghc dynlinking on
aarch64: the statically linked ghc binaries don't exhibit the problem.

I managed to build ghc-7.10.1 RC3 on F21 aarch64
using DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS=NO.

Next I plan to backport the needed patches to 7.8.4
and build it too with DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS=NO on aarch64.
Until the root (linking?) problem is fixed that seems
the best short-term solution currently.  It is unclear
at the moment if all executables will need to be
Haskell statically linked to work properly.

GHC upstream will not support aarch64 officially 7.12
and will use llvm like the 32bit arm port.
It will require llvm-3.6 which should include the needed
ghc calling conventions.  So F23 (assuming we move to 7.10)
will likely be in a similar position to F22 but at least
we know it builds with gcc there already. :)

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #5)
> GHC upstream will not support aarch64 officially *until* 7.12

(At the moment ghc on aarch64 using the gcc backend is predictably
(very) slow - moving to optimized support with llvm will see
big performance improvement: hopefully we will have llvm-3.6 in F23.)

Also a question: there is no ld.gold on aarch64?
I was hoping to try that for the above linking issue
but then discovered there was none..  We are using
ld.gold on armv7 for ghc-7.8.4, and quite likely it
may be needed later also for aarch64 (with llvm).

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #6)
> Also a question: there is no ld.gold on aarch64?

I opened bug 1203057 against binutils for this.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen  ---
Here is a "successful" koji build (without ghci) :-)

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2925034

ld.gold may help to get ghci working.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #8)
> Here is a "successful" koji build (without ghci) :-)
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2925034

Note the missing ghci files would be taken care of by updating
ghc-srpm-macros to drop aarch64 from %ghc_arches_with_ghci.

Still it would be good to test building with ld.gold
to see if that can avoid dropping the new ghci support.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends On|                            |1203057

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203057
[Bug 1203057] no ld.gold on aarch64

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST

--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen  ---
Completed scratch build (with newer ghc-srpm-macros):
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2928744

I opened bug 1203951 to track the (new) lack of ghci on aarch64.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Peter Robinson  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson  ---
What is the status here? There's been no movement for some time and we need a
fix submitted and stable in time for the beta freeze which is next Tuesday.

It looks like a boostrap build was submitted to rawhide but not the follow up
post bootstrap build but none of this has been submitted to F-22

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|POST                        |MODIFIED
              Flags|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #11)
> What is the status here? There's been no movement for some time and we need
> a fix submitted and stable in time for the beta freeze which is next
> Tuesday.

Sorry for the delay I was on holiday Thu-Fri.
> It looks like a boostrap build was submitted to rawhide but not the follow
> up post bootstrap build but none of this has been submitted to F-22

ghc-7.8.4-42.2.fc23 is the initial bootstrap for arm64.
I can build it too for f22 but I think it is safest
to do the f23 production build first for Rawhide
and make sure it is sane, then building it all
for F22 should be just straightforward enough.

I will build ghc-7.8.4-43.fc23 once -42.2.fc23 is built for aarch64.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Peter Robinson  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson  ---
> I will build ghc-7.8.4-43.fc23 once -42.2.fc23 is built for aarch64.

It is now built:

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2943144

Please test and update once -43 is built for mainline.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen  ---
Thanks

I was trying to test it now but unfortunately I seem to have vpn connectivity
problems at home which prevented me.

Anyway I went ahead and set off the ghc-7.8.4-43.fc23 build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=622450

And also setting off ghc-7.8.4-42.2.fc22 shortly since it is so late now.
(42.x are the first builds with bootstrapping conditional on arch, dunno why
I hadn't thought of that before.)

Let's keep our fingers crossed these builds are good for arm64, hopefully
should be. :)

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen  ---
f22 bootstrap build fired off now:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9367269

Hopefully koji-shadow can catch the -43 builds?

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen  ---
-42.2.fc22 and -43.fc23 are done

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #16)
> -42.2.fc22 and -43.fc23 are done

-42.2.fc22 failed, it's got some missing ghci files, which I presume is
expected, and we had the correct rpm macros 4.13 for the build.

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2944082

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen  ---
My apologies I forgot (to mention here) that ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22 is
needed for the aarch64 build.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen  ---
I tested -43.fc23 and it basically looks okay to me so far (of course no ghci)
however it does not generate shared libraries by default apparently.
So at least ghc-rpm-macros needs to be updated for aarch64 to handle that.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson  ---
(In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #20)
> ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22

Can you pull that update and submit all the fixes as a single update please

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson  ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #21)
> (In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #20)
> > ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22
>
> Can you pull that update and submit all the fixes as a single update please

I've revoked the request so it won't go to testing, please edit and add all
NVRs required to fix this (I'm aware of at least ghc, ghc-rpm-macros,
ghc-srpm-macros)

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #16)
> -42.2.fc22 and -43.fc23 are done

OK, -42.2 is now complete, please tag it into mainline overrides for f22 and
rebuild -43

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2944793

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen  ---
Just for the record I tried building with ld.gold but it didn't seem
to help and I still got the error in comment 0.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen  ---
BTW there was already an update for ghc-rpm-macros but I don't think it is
strictly needed currently for f22 actually.  Anyway i going to do another
ghc-rpm-macros update to workaround no shared libs getting built by default
on arm64 now.  I will add that to the arm64 update.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen  ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=625549
is the ghc-7.8.4-43.fc22 build

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen  ---
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc23 was built for rawhide.
With that it should be possible to build Haskell packages now there for
aarch64.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Peter Robinson  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #27)
> ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc23 was built for rawhide.
> With that it should be possible to build Haskell packages now there for
> aarch64.

Is it needed for F-22 or are we OK to build ghc -43 on F-22 without
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc23

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #28)
> Is it needed for F-22 or are we OK to build ghc -43 on F-22 without
> ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc23

No ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14 is not needed for the -43 build
(and the rawhide build was also done without it).

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System  ---
Package ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22, ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc22,
ghc-7.8.4-43.fc22:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc22 ghc-7.8.4-43.fc22'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5414/ghc-7.8.4-43.fc22,g...
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://bugzilla.redhat.com
                   |                            |/show_bug.cgi?id=1203951

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |MODIFIED

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |1043128
                   |                            |(BetaFreezeException,F22Bet
                   |                            |aFreezeException)

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043128
[Bug 1043128] Fedora 22 Beta freeze exception bug tracker

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends On|1203057                     |

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203057
[Bug 1203057] no ld.gold on aarch64

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Peter Robinson  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #31 from Peter Robinson  ---
Issue when building haskell-platform-2014.2.0.0.1-1.fc22 with the following
error but the right version of alex (3.1.3) was in the build root:

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2950552

+ ghc --make -no-user-package-db -dynamic Setup
[1 of 1] Compiling Main             ( Setup.hs, Setup.o )
Linking Setup ...
++ echo ' -O2' -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-grecord-gcc-switches
++ sed -e 's/ / -optc/g'
++ echo ' -Wl,-z,relro'
++ sed -e 's/ / -optl/g'
+ ./Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/haskell-platform '--libsubdir=$compiler/$pkgid'
'--datasubdir=$pkgid' --ghc --enable-executable-dynamic '--ghc-options=
-optc-O2 -optc-g -optc-pipe -optc-Wall -optc-Werror=format-security
-optc-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -optc-fexceptions -optc-fstack-protector-strong
-optc--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -optc-grecord-gcc-switches  -optl-Wl,-z,relro'
--user -p --enable-shared --docdir=/usr/share/doc/ghc-haskell-platform
--htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/haskell-platform-2014.2.0.0.1
Configuring haskell-platform-2014.2.0.0.1...
Setup: The program alex version ==3.1.3 is required but the version of
/usr/bin/alex could not be determined.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #31)
> Configuring haskell-platform-2014.2.0.0.1...
> Setup: The program alex version ==3.1.3 is required but the version of
> /usr/bin/alex could not be determined.

Strange.  It might be a bug - this certainly shouldn't happen.

Do you mind opening a separate bug for this?
I think a workaround would be to comment out alex in haskell-platform.cabal.
Luckily I don't think any package in Fedora depends on haskell-platform or its
subpackages so this is just a leaf package build issue.
I guess I can build a workaround later for aarch64.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen  ---
Okay, I filed bug 1210323 for the haskell-platform build issue.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #34 from Jens Petersen  ---
BTW would it be better to untag -42.2.fc22 for arm64?  I see various
shadow builds failing because of it getting pulled into builds.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #35 from Peter Robinson  ---
can you check the failure in ghc-texmath
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2960203

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Petr Schindler  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
             Blocks|1043128                     |
                   |(BetaFreezeException,F22Bet |
                   |aFreezeException)           |
         Whiteboard|                            |RejectedFreezeException

--- Comment #36 from Petr Schindler  ---
Discussed at today's blocker review meeting [1].

This bug was rejected as Freeze Exception - on currently available info we
don't see a clear reason this needs to have a freeze exception, it's causing
issues with package builds but there are other avenues for dealing with that.
We will re-discuss this if re-proposed with a better justification

[1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-13/

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043128
[Bug 1043128] Fedora 22 Beta freeze exception bug tracker

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #35)
> can you check the failure in ghc-texmath
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2960203

+ ./Setup test
Running 1 test suites...
Test suite test-texmath: RUNNING...
test-texmath: src/unicode.tex: hGetContents: invalid argument (invalid byte
sequence)
Test suite test-texmath: FAIL

No idea why that only happens on arm64.

I pushed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9485755 for Rawhide
(though still building/stuck on armv7 :-/)

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #34)
> BTW would it be better to untag -42.2.fc22 for arm64?  I see various
> shadow builds failing because of it getting pulled into builds.

Also would it make sense to untag older ghc-rpm-macros in koji arm for f22/f23:
I think only ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1 is good for current arm64 ghc, various
shadow builds might be pulling in older ghc-rpm-macros.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-texmath-0.8.0.1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-texmath-0.8.0.1-2.fc22

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |ASSIGNED
         Depends On|                            |1203057

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203057
[Bug 1203057] no ld.gold on aarch64

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen  ---
*** Bug 1210323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen  ---
I will update ghc to use ld.gold on aarch64 once we have it available for
aarch64.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen  ---
Worse news is that packages affected will likely need to be rebuilt
to fix the issue (maybe all packages with executables).

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #43 from Peter Robinson  ---
Why did this work in F-21 without the gold linker?

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc2
                   |                            |2
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2015-04-21 15:13:13

--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc22, ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.14-1.fc22, ghc-7.8.4-43.fc22
has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.  If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
   Fixed In Version|ghc-srpm-macros-1.4.1-1.fc2 |
                   |2                           |
         Resolution|ERRATA                      |---
           Keywords|                            |Reopened

--- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen  ---
Reopening for coming ld.gold fix.

(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #43)
> Why did this work in F-21 without the gold linker?

Not sure: the ld.gold patch is new for armv7 too for 7.8.4,
7.6.3 didn't need it.  (It was merged for 7.10,
see https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8976 .)

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen  ---
I am hoping that
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ghc.git/commit/?id=6bb2991c51da42756a452b...
should fix aarch64 ghc
(this is a backport of a change that will be in ghc-7.10.2).

My local test build on a single core is still running...

Once binutils with ld.gold (bug 1203057) is built in arm koji
I can test build there.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #46)
> I am hoping that
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ghc.git/commit/
> ?id=6bb2991c51da42756a452b8e2c97c0181b71f740 should fix aarch64 ghc
> (this is a backport of a change that will be in ghc-7.10.2).

Unfortunately not.  I am trying now with 7.10.1.
> Once binutils with ld.gold (bug 1203057) is built in arm koji
> I can test build there.

Thanks - it is in arm64 f23 now.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #48 from Jens Petersen  ---
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2972501 is a scratch
build turning on ghci and ld.gold but still without dynamic linked ghc progs.

I wonder if this could help with the above reported Haskell package build
problems
(build-tools detect failures).

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #49 from Jens Petersen  ---
Unfortunately the 7.8.4 ld.gold build did not seem to help.

Currently the only workaround seems to be to build aarch64 executables
statically linked to Haskell libraries (like in F21).
That is probably what we should do for F22: it would require
rebuilding some of the packages with static subpackages though.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-texmath-0.8.0.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64 (stdout from subprocesses lost)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|ghc-7.8.4 build fails to    |ghc-7.8.4 build fails to
                   |complete on aarch64         |complete on aarch64 (stdout
                   |                            |from subprocesses lost)

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64 (stdout from subprocesses lost)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #51 from Jens Petersen  ---
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-1.fc23 disables dynamic linking for Haskell packages
on aarch64.

However note some packages now have static subpackages and they need to be
tweaked to take this change into account.

[Bug 1195231] ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64 (stdout from subprocesses lost)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-1.fc22

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|ghc-7.8.4 build fails to    |aarch64 ghc dynlinked
                   |complete on aarch64 (stdout |executable subprocesses
                   |from subprocesses lost)     |losing stdout
                   |                            |(was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails
                   |                            |to complete on aarch64)

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc22

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System  ---
Package ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc22:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc22'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8835/ghc-rpm-macros-1.4....
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc2
                   |                            |2
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|2015-04-21 15:13:13         |2015-06-05 20:07:19

--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|ERRATA                      |---

--- Comment #56 from Jens Petersen  ---
Keeping this open since the root problem has not been fixed.

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231
Bug 1195231 depends on bug 1203057, which changed state.

Bug 1203057 Summary: no ld.gold on aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203057

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |RAWHIDE

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #57 from Jens Petersen  ---
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3032408
is a scratch build to test this with binutils-2.25-10.fc23

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST

--- Comment #58 from Jens Petersen  ---
Wow that worked too!

(task (unpackaged files) failure is just due to current ghc-rpm-macros
needing tweaking for ghc-7.10)

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #59 from Jens Petersen  ---
and trying a 7.8.4 scratch build:
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3032845

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #60 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #59)
> and trying a 7.8.4 scratch build:
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3032845

That seemed to hang (after 8 hours;). :-(

Here is another attempt:

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3033106

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://bugzilla.redhat.com
                   |                            |/show_bug.cgi?id=1215546

--- Comment #61 from Jens Petersen  ---
Okay I think I fixed the aarch64 gold patch now for 7.8.4
and it built for me locally on aarch64!!

It is building now in main koji for f23 rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10060578

Once binutils-2.25-8.fc22 is in F22 Updates we can fix this too for F22. :-)

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System  ---
binutils-2.25-8.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/binutils-2.25-8.fc22

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-2.fc2 |ghc-7.8.4-46.fc23
                   |2                           |

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|POST                        |ON_QA

--- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System  ---
Package binutils-2.25-8.fc22:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing binutils-2.25-8.fc22'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-10051/binutils-2.25-8.fc...
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|ghc-7.8.4-46.fc23           |binutils-2.25-8.fc22
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|2015-06-05 20:07:19         |2015-06-20 20:18:03

--- Comment #64 from Fedora Update System  ---
binutils-2.25-8.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|ERRATA                      |---

--- Comment #65 from Jens Petersen  ---
Reopening for the F22 ghc build for this.

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

--- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System  ---
Package ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22, ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-3.fc22:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22
ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-3.fc22'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-10533/ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22,...
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

[Bug 1195231] aarch64 ghc dynlinked executable subprocesses losing stdout (was:ghc-7.8.4 build fails to complete on aarch64)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195231

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|binutils-2.25-8.fc22        |ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|2015-06-20 20:18:03         |2015-07-13 15:11:29

--- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-7.8.4-45.fc22, ghc-rpm-macros-1.4.15-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora
22 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.