Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
--- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2008-11-24 22:20:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20)
There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there?
Yes, probably not, but I think actually the -prof subpackage should not require the main package (just ghc-prof), so it would be possible to install -prof alone. Does that change anything?
I am adding a little shell script called cabal2spec in ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11 which generates a ghc library spec files for a hackage tarball argument from cabal-lib-template.spec. It could also generate ghc-zlib.spec with build_doc and build_prof switches.
See http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc/
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org