Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-11-14 07:12:35 EDT
---
Thanks for the update and continued effort on this package.
I think we are getting nearly there. :)
(In reply to comment #22)
The intention was GPLv2. The license block in the Cabal says GPL,
but
the License file it points at is the GPLv2.
Likely Neil (the author) is not familiar with the
Fedora's distinction of GPLv2 vs GPLv2+,
but I will try and find what
the Haskell/Cabal approved way is to mark GPL versions in the license
field.
AFAIK there isn't one :-( so we should probably complain to
cabal/hackage about it, and request adding of GPLvN but getting
it fine-grained enough for Fedora will probably be hard I suspect.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.