Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-01-20 21:19:41 EST --- Doh - would help if I actually looked at the right package...
You're right SHA256.hsc is marked GPL. I actually talked to the author about this and he remarked that he had rewritten the file recently but that does not affect this review... So yeah I think the License tag should be "GPL+".
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org