Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: Ready Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 648246,737228,742882 Blocks: 648248,713359 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged.spec
SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14.sr...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-10-17 00:51:41 EDT --- *** Bug 648247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-tagged
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |petersen@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-10-27 00:05:29 EDT --- Thanks for the submission - looks fine to me.
Here is the review:
+:ok, NA: not applicable
MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output [1]
ghc-tagged.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype ghc-tagged.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ghc-tagged.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype ghc-tagged.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ghc-tagged-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[+] MUST: package named according to Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [2] [+] MUST: meet Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: Fedora approved license and Licensing Guidelines BSD 3 clause [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [3] [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [4] [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English [5] and legible. [6] [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release (from upstream URL)
7899d417f18952a5a56b8588ba4724e4 tagged-0.2.3.1.tar.gz
[+] MUST: successfully compile and build into binary rpms on a primary arch [7]
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3465018
[NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [8] [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [9] [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [11] [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [12] [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [13] [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [14] [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [15] [+] MUST: consistently use macros [16] [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [18] [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [18] [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [21] [NA] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [20] [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [22] [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [23] [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24]
SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If upstream source does not include license text file(s), the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [25] [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [27] [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [29] [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [21]
The source files also include headers tagged with the license. :)
Package is APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Ready |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|unspecified |medium Flag| |fedora-cvs+ Severity|unspecified |medium
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-10-27 13:23:04 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-tagged Short Description: Newtype wrappers for phantom types Owners: narasim Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-10-27 13:23:37 EDT --- Thanks for the review!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-10-28 10:13:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2002@gmail.com 2011-10-28 11:28:13 EDT --- Built for rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=271224
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Bug 746557 depends on bug 742882, which changed state.
Bug 742882 Summary: Review Request: ghc-semigroups - Provides Haskell 98 semigroups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742882
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-03 23:44:44 EDT --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-03 23:44:51 EDT --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-05 19:57:29 EDT --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-06 17:07:32 EST --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-11-22 19:52:41
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-22 19:52:41 EST --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 |ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc15
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-22 19:55:14 EST --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc15 |ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc16
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-22 20:00:48 EST --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ghc-tagged New Branches: el6 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org