Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304
--- Comment #24 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2008-09-05 12:23:36 EDT --- Rajesh, are any of those executables necessary at all? Are they needed for testing the package itself after being built? Are they necessary for testing packages that depend on them?
In any case, I think you should name the spec file 'ghc-crypto.spec' and iclude a comment stating the exception. There's no need to revise the guidelines for something like this. Secondly, if the executables are not needed once the package has been built, note that there is a %test section in the RPM spec that is not often used. Feel free to take advantage of this.
If they are needed for dependencies, then just spit out a -devel package, comment why it's needed, and comment on it in the review as well.
As for the makefile business, The macros are based on bryan's work.
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org