[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] New: "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
10:08 a.m.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15
x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Summary: "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library
in Fedora 15 x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: xmonad
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: avendael(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, mathstuf(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
xmonad --recompile reports missing libX11.so library when the command is
invoked on an x64 system. This is because libX11.x86_64 is not installed as a
dependency when xmonad.x86_64 is installed through yum. Installing
libX11.x86_64 fixes the problem.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Name : xmonad
Arch : x86_64
Version : 0.9.2
Release : 8.fc15
How reproducible: always (100%)
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install the x86_64 versions of xmonad, ghc-xmonad-contrib,
ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel, and xmonad-gnome
2. Create a minimal xmonad config in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs
3. Invoke `xmonad --recompile` in a terminal
Actual results:
`xmonad --recompile` fails with linking errors due to a missing libX11.so
Expected results:
libX11.x86_64 should be pulled as a dependency when xmonad.x86_64 is installed
to prevent the linking problem when `xmonad --recompile` is invoked.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:27 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(avendael(a)gmail.co
| |m)
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-20 23:27:07 EDT ---
Hmm, sounds little a suspicious: all of
xmonad-core.x86_64, ghc-xmonad-contrib.x86_64 should
pull in libX11.x86_64.
Did you start from a minimal install or convert from a 32bit install
or something weird like that?
Could you please attach the relevant output from yum.log?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:50 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(avendael(a)gmail.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #2 from Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-20 23:50:39 EDT
---
My system is a fresh Fedora 15 x64 installation using the x64 minimal iso. Here
are some points in yum.log that might be relevant:
Jul 12 06:08:20 Installed: libX11-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
Jul 16 00:25:16 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
...
Jul 18 01:06:14 Installed: ghc-base-4.3.1.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:14 Installed: ghc-old-locale-1.0.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:14 Installed: ghc-old-time-1.0.0.6-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:15 Installed: ghc-unix-2.4.2.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:15 Installed: ghc-filepath-1.2.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:16 Installed: ghc-directory-1.1.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:16 Installed: ghc-array-0.3.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:16 Installed: ghc-process-1.0.1.5-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:17 Installed: ghc-syb-0.3-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:17 Installed: ghc-X11-1.5.0.0-11.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:18 Installed: ghc-time-1.2.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:18 Installed: ghc-transformers-0.2.2.0-6.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:18 Installed: ghc-mtl-2.0.1.0-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:19 Installed: ghc-random-1.0.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:19 Installed: ghc-containers-0.4.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:20 Installed: ghc-bytestring-0.9.1.10-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:20 Installed: ghc-extensible-exceptions-0.1.1.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:20 Installed: ghc-xmonad-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:21 Installed: ghc-utf8-string-0.3.6-9.fc15.1.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:21 Installed: ghc-haskell98-1.1.0.1-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:21 Installed: ghc-X11-xft-0.3-15.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:23 Installed: libmpc-0.8.3-0.3.svn855.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:23 Installed: libXext-devel-1.2.0-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:24 Installed: libXinerama-devel-1.1.1-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:25 Installed: cpp-4.6.0-9.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:26 Installed: ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.9.2-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:26 Installed: libXrender-devel-0.9.6-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:27 Installed: kernel-headers-2.6.38.8-35.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:28 Installed: glibc-headers-2.14-4.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:29 Installed: glibc-devel-2.14-4.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:29 Installed: ppl-pwl-0.11.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:30 Installed: ppl-0.11.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:30 Installed: cloog-ppl-0.15.9-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:33 Installed: gcc-4.6.0-9.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:33 Installed: 1:gmp-devel-4.3.2-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:34 Installed: xorg-x11-apps-7.6-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:34 Installed: zlib-devel-1.2.5-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:35 Installed: freetype-devel-2.4.4-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:36 Installed: fontconfig-devel-2.8.0-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:36 Installed: libXft-devel-2.2.0-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:36 Installed: xterm-268-1.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:37 Installed: xmonad-core-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:37 Installed: libffi-devel-3.0.9-2.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:40 Installed: ghc-7.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:44 Installed: ghc-base-devel-4.3.1.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:47 Installed: ghc-unix-devel-2.4.2.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:47 Installed: ghc-old-locale-devel-1.0.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:48 Installed: ghc-old-time-devel-1.0.0.6-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:48 Installed: ghc-filepath-devel-1.2.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:49 Installed: ghc-directory-devel-1.1.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:49 Installed: ghc-process-devel-1.0.1.5-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:50 Installed:
ghc-extensible-exceptions-devel-0.1.1.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:50 Installed: ghc-array-devel-0.3.0.2-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:52 Installed: ghc-containers-devel-0.4.0.0-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:53 Installed: ghc-time-devel-1.2.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:54 Installed: ghc-random-devel-1.0.0.3-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:54 Installed: ghc-haskell98-devel-1.1.0.1-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:55 Installed: ghc-syb-devel-0.3-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:56 Installed: ghc-X11-devel-1.5.0.0-11.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:57 Installed: ghc-bytestring-devel-0.9.1.10-16.3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:58 Installed: ghc-utf8-string-devel-0.3.6-9.fc15.1.x86_64
Jul 18 01:06:59 Installed: ghc-X11-xft-devel-0.3-15.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:00 Installed: ghc-transformers-devel-0.2.2.0-6.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:00 Installed: ghc-mtl-devel-2.0.1.0-4.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:01 Installed: ghc-xmonad-devel-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:03 Installed: ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel-0.9.2-3.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:04 Installed: xmonad-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
Jul 18 01:07:04 Installed: xmonad-gnome-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
...
Jul 20 22:45:06 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
I'm attaching the whole yum.log in this report since there are a lot of i686
packages at the time of installation.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:52 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #3 from Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-20 23:52:20 EDT
---
Created attachment 514119
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=514119
yum.log since the time of Fedora 15 installation
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:32 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|mathstuf(a)gmail.com |petersen(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-27 05:32:10 EDT ---
I see thanks - I am still a bit confused.
What is the output of the following:
1. rpm -qa libX11\*
2. rpm -V ghc-X11
How exactly did you install F15 originally?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:26 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #5 from Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-27 08:26:52 EDT
---
You're welcome.
Here's the output for:
1. rpm -qa libX11\*
libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
libX11-common-1.4.3-1.fc15.noarch
libX11-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
libX11-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
2. rpm -V ghc-X11
No output. So I verified if ghc-X11 is installed:
yum list installed | grep ghc-X11
ghc-X11.x86_64 1.5.0.0-11.fc15
@fedora
ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 1.5.0.0-11.fc15
@fedora
ghc-X11-xft.x86_64 0.3-15.fc15
@fedora
ghc-X11-xft-devel.x86_64 0.3-15.fc15
@fedora
I installed F15 by selecting a mirror in
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/15/x86_64/. If I'm not
mistaken I used a netinst iso found in
http://fedora.inode.at/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-....
Sorry if I can't remember the exact link location. I double checked the actual
iso in my bootable usb and it's filename is Fedora-15-x86_64-netinst.iso. I
opted to do a netinstall because I haven't found a working liveiso and I do not
have a working Fedora installation to make one for myself.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:16 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-27 09:16:17 EDT ---
I see thank you. Then could you also attach /root/install.log, please?
Would still like to get to the bottom of this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:54 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #7 from Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-27 11:54:07 EDT
---
Created attachment 515551
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515551
/root/install.log
Sure. Here it is. Thank you!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:55 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-28 09:55:33 EDT ---
Ok I think this is a yum devel multilib issue.
Your install of libao.i686:
Jul 16 00:25:16 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686
Jul 16 00:25:17 Installed: libao-1.0.0-3.fc15.i686
made
Jul 18 01:07:04 Installed: xmonad-0.9.2-8.fc15.x86_64
think that libX11-devel is already installed since it
can differentiate between x86_64 and i686.
So ideally the libX11-devel requires should specify
the arch. Unfortunately short of a filepath requires
I am not very sure how to do that in rpm.
I guess:
Jul 20 22:45:06 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
then fixed your problem, right?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:21 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-28 10:21:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
think that libX11-devel is already installed since it
can differentiate between x86_64 and i686.
I mean can't.
So ideally the libX11-devel requires should specify
the arch. Unfortunately short of a filepath requires
I am not very sure how to do that in rpm.
Ok I just got educated on #fedora-devel about %{?_isa}
which should indeed fix this and avoid the problem
from reoccurring in the future.
Thank you very much for your report!
This should be fixed in xmonad-0.9.2-10.fc17.
* Thu Jul 28 2011 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 0.9.2-10
- add _isa to the ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel requires to avoid missing libX11.so
when custom linking (reported by Evan Dale Aromin, #723558)
We may well backport this fix later to F16 and earlier.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:59 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED
Component|xmonad |ghc-rpm-macros
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-28 11:58:59 EDT
---
Erm, well above is for the similar but unlikely issue for haskell library devel
packages.
The correct fix for C library devel packages is actually needed in
ghc-rpm-macros, which handles ghc_pkg_c_deps.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:39 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|"xmonad --recompile" |ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should
|reports missing libX11.so |require
|library in Fedora 15 x86_64 |libX11-devel(x86_64)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:28 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #11 from Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-28 13:28:18 EDT
---
I guess:
Jul 20 22:45:06 Installed: libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.x86_64
then fixed your problem, right?
Yes. "yum provides */libX11.so" made me figure out what's needed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:33 p.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #12 from Evan Dale Aromin <avendael(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-28 13:33:24 EDT
---
Thank you very much for your report!
This should be fixed in xmonad-0.9.2-10.fc17.
I'm glad to help. Thank you so much for answering back to my report!
* Thu Jul 28 2011 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> -
0.9.2-10
- add _isa to the ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel requires to avoid missing libX11.so
when custom linking (reported by Evan Dale Aromin, #723558)
We may well backport this fix later to F16 and earlier.
Until the fix is backported, should this be added to the F15 common bugs wiki?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:40 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|ghc-rpm-macros |ghc-X11
AssignedTo|petersen(a)redhat.com |mathstuf(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-08-17 04:40:07 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Until the fix is backported, should this be added to the F15 common
bugs wiki?
That might be overkill: I don't know if anyone else has hit this problem?
Though I still wonder why libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686 was installed?
Having thought again about this I conclude that it is really up
to the individual libraries to add the %{_isa} to their requires.
Generically we can't be sure that an arbitrary -devel package is
arch or noarch: though no doubt yum could handle this better.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:27 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|15 |rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:30 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-08-17 05:30:07 EDT
---
I have made local changes to all the ghc-*.spec files that
use ghc_pkg_c_deps to append %{?_isa} to foreign devel deps,
and will commit those soon or next I rebuild the packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:13 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 723558] ghc-X11-devel.x86_64 should require libX11-devel(x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
AssignedTo|mathstuf(a)gmail.com |petersen(a)redhat.com
Last Closed| |2011-12-03 02:13:46
--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-12-03 02:13:46 EST
---
Fixed in ghc-X11-1.5.0.0-13.fc17 and ghc-X11-xft-0.3.1-1.fc17.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4560
days inactive
4696
days old
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
17 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla