[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466857] New: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857
Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning
off the toolbar
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
ibus normally shows it's toolbar all the time, but it can be hidden when off.
It should also be possible to turn off (hide) the toolbar completely.
(SCIM supports such a feature though it is not commonly used.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] New: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871
Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload"
configuration
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
ibus-setup has checkboxes for started and preload but I think this is too
complicated for most used and they should just be merged into one option for
simplicity since that is generally what one wants. Maybe a start/stop toggle
button could be added instead of started if it is useful - that would make the
UI much clearer anyway: then selecting an engine should probably start it
automatically and users could stop it temporarily if necessary by clicking on
toggle state button.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to engines setup to choose engines
Actual results:
two sets of confusing checkboxes
Expected results:
single checkbox per engine
Additional info:
Being able to start/stop engines dynamically from the setup is a nice feature.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] New: ibus-table : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615
Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: ibus-table
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:
=> ibus-table-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/engine
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
=> ibus-table-additional-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch
(rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
=> ibus-table-chinese-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
/usr/share/ibus-table/data
Note: It might be necessary to only add them to the main package.
[...]
Further information:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwner...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] New: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction!
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009
Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small
correction!
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: glibc
AssignedTo: jakub(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ankit(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Character "ળ" (0AB3) needs to be sorted after the character "હ" (0AB9)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora rawhide!
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create folders with the name starting from the character (0AB3) and (0AB9)
2. Sort them using simple "sort by name" method
3. Check the order of the folders sorted
Actual results:
Folder names starting with (0AB3) is sorted before folder names starting with
(0AB9)
Expected results:
Folder names starting with (0AB3) should be sorted after folder names starting
with (0AB9)
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] New: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146
Summary: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
ibus-gtk requires libibus-gtk.so which is in the main ibus package. ibus.i386
and ibus.x86_64 conflict therefore ibus-gtk.i386 cannot be installed on the
x86_64 system and ibus-gtk cannot be used with 32bit applications.
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora on x86_64
2. Try to install ibus-gtk.i386
Actual results:
2. conflict between ibus.i386 and ibus.x86_64
Expected results:
2. libibus-gtk should be packaged in a package which can be installed multilib
(e.g. ibus-libs).
Additional info:
Additional problem is that currently ibus is multilib not ibus-gtk which is
wrong.
(It seems only ibus-x11 is linked to libibus-gtk.so.0.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466085] New: ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466085
Summary: ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
SSIA. GNOME HIG doesn't recommend the frame for UI say. see GNOME HIG doc for
more details.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465425] New: ibus-setup window too small to display engines start and preload
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-setup window too small to display engines start and preload
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465425
Summary: ibus-setup window too small to display engines start
and preload
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The IBus setup program default window size requires using widget scrollbars to
see the whole engines pane selection widget.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run ibus-setup (on Japanese desktop if it matters)
2. select Engines pane
Actual results:
Window is too narrow to display full width of treeview.
Expected results:
All of horizontal tree to appear, either by making the window wider by default
and/or truncating the length of language name strings if necessary.
Additional info:
Dhivehi name entry is very wide.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467048] New: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467048
Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless
of the key
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #466657 +++
Description of problem:
key input too faster and too much messes up IBus.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10
Steps to Reproduce:
1.input something too much and too faster
2.
3.
Actual results:
discarding the key event or return the same key event regardless of what
pressing/releasing the key.
Expected results:
should works expectedly.
Additional info:
Technically it happens when multiple XIM_FORWARD_EVENT is added to the property
when the key event is delivered faster than processing it in IBus. and when
it's there more than 4 in the property, it results the same output regardless
of what you are pressing/releasing the key. otherwise the key event is
discarded.
Why it returns the same key event when the property has something more than 4,
IMdkit is getting the value from the property wrongly. a quote from man page:
int XGetWindowProperty(Display *display, Window w, Atom property, long
long_offset, long long_length, Bool delete, Atom reg_type, Atom
*actual_type_return, int *actual_format_return, unsigned long
*nitems_return, unsigned long *bytes_after_return, unsigned char
**prop_return);
...
long_length
Specifies the length in 32-bit multiples of the data to be
retrieved.
and XGetWindowProperty won't delete the property value even if "delete" is
True, when there are still unread data.
To do the right thing, read the data with the proper length to not discard the
event. and if there are still the unread data in the property, read next data
with "long_offset".
--- Additional comment from shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com on 2008-10-13 23:07:48 EDT
---
Could you provide a patch to fix XIM problem? Thanks.
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-14 06:43:58 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=320277)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320277)
test code for discarding the key event issue
% gcc scim_discarding.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0 gio-2.0`
% GTK_IM_MODULE=xim XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM ./a.out
After pressing the button, "ab" should be put on the entry. otherwise SCIM may
be discarding the forward event.
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-14 06:47:45 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=320278)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320278)
test code for output the same result regardless of the key
% gcc scim_repeat.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0 gio-2.0`
% GTK_IM_MODULE=xim XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM ./a.out
After pressing the button, "abc" should be put to the entry box. but actual
result is "aaaaaa". this testing code is sending KeyPress and KeyRelease events
for "a", "b" and "c". and usually GTK+ and other toolkits doesn't take any
actions for KeyRelease event. thus, this means SCIM sends back the forward
event for "a" with KeyPress 6 times.
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-15 05:05:18 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=320407)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320407)
test code for discarding the key event issue
missed one ClientMessage event
--- Additional comment from tagoh(a)redhat.com on 2008-10-15 07:18:44 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=320412)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320412)
proposed patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465430] New: ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465430
Summary: ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Here is the packet dump from libgxim:
D[ 1223025108.607584]:[transport/summary] 0x1400009 <- opcode:
XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY(major: 57, minor 0) length: 20
D[ 1223025108.607586]:[transport/dump] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C
D E F 0123456789ABCDEF
D[ 1223025108.607587]:[transport/dump]
--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--=----------------
D[ 1223025108.607588]:[transport/dump]
39:00:03:00:05:00:05:00:04:00:00:00:cf:00:00:00 9...............
D[ 1223025108.607588]:[transport/dump] 00:00:00:00
....
This means:
1 major-opcode CARD8 0x39
1 minor-opcode CARD8 0
2 length CARD16 3 (* length field specifies the number of
4 bytes elements following the header.)
2 input-method ID CARD16 5
2 input-ctxt ID CARD16 5
2 byte length of ic-attribute n 4
2 unused
n LISTofXICATTRIBUTE
XICATTRIBUTE is defined as:
2 CARD16 attribute ID
2 n value length
n value
p unused, p = Pad(n)
So:
attribute ID CARD16 0xcf
value length n 0
There are 2 bad packets here. one is, the value length is 0. on this session,
attribute ID 0xcf means filterEvents, which the value type is CARD32. so the
value length has to be 4. and another one is, the byte length of ic-attribute
is wrong.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-0.1.1.20081001-1.fc10.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months