[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] New: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481
Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans
regular
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/506469
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: holger(a)layer-acht.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
From: "Nikos Asimakis" <nikos.asimakis(a)gmail.com>
To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org
Subject: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:54:11 +0200
Package: ttf-liberation
Version: 1.04.92-1
Severity: normal
After updating to version 1.04.92-1 the character μ (U+03BC, GREEK
SMALL LETTER MU) appears ugly
when using Liberation Sans.
When using Liberation Sans Bold, Italic and all the variants of
Liberation Serif and Mono, μ appears OK.
You can see the problem in GNOME Character Map, when using Liberation
Sans as GNOME's default
application font and in Firefox.
I am attaching a small html to demonstrate the problem:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Liberation Fonts Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;">
Liberation Sans<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-weight:bold;">
Liberation Sans Bold<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-style:italic;">
Liberation Sans Italic<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
Liberation Sans Bold Italic<br />μμμ</p>
<hr />
<p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;">
Liberation Serif<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-weight:bold;">
Liberation Serif Bold<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-style:italic;">
Liberation Serif Italic<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
Liberation Serif Bold Italic<br />μμμ</p>
<hr />
<p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;">
Liberation Mono<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-weight:bold;">
Liberation Mono Bold<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-style:italic;">
Liberation Mono Italic<br />μμμ</p>
<p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
Liberation Mono Bold Italic<br />μμμ</p>
</body>
</html>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages ttf-liberation depends on:
ii defoma 0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f
ttf-liberation recommends no packages.
ttf-liberation suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466657] New: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466657
Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless
of the key
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: scim
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
key input too faster and too much messes up SCIM.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scim-1.4.7-34.fc10
Steps to Reproduce:
1.input something too much and too faster
2.
3.
Actual results:
discarding the key event or return the same key event regardless of what
pressing/releasing the key.
Expected results:
should works expectedly.
Additional info:
Technically it happens when multiple XIM_FORWARD_EVENT is added to the property
when the key event is delivered faster than processing it in SCIM. and when
it's there more than 4 in the property, it results the same output regardless
of what you are pressing/releasing the key. otherwise the key event is
discarded.
Why it returns the same key event when the property has something more than 4,
IMdkit is getting the value from the property wrongly. a quote from man page:
int XGetWindowProperty(Display *display, Window w, Atom property, long
long_offset, long long_length, Bool delete, Atom reg_type, Atom
*actual_type_return, int *actual_format_return, unsigned long
*nitems_return, unsigned long *bytes_after_return, unsigned char
**prop_return);
...
long_length
Specifies the length in 32-bit multiples of the data to be
retrieved.
and XGetWindowProperty won't delete the property value even if "delete" is
True, when there are still unread data.
To do the right thing, read the data with the proper length to not discard the
event. and if there are still the unread data in the property, read next data
with "long_offset".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462820] New: [sd_IN] Sindhi Inscript keymap is not displayed with its own language category in scim toolbar.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [sd_IN] Sindhi Inscript keymap is not displayed with its own language category in scim toolbar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462820
Summary: [sd_IN] Sindhi Inscript keymap is not displayed with
its own language category in scim toolbar.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: scim
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Sindhi Inscript keymap is not displayed with its own language category in scim
toolbar.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scim-1.4.7-31.fc10.i386
m17n-contrib-sindhi-1.1.7-3.fc10.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install above given packages
2. start scim toolbar
3. observe that si-inscript is listed under others category in scim toolbar
Actual results:
sindhi inscript keymap is listed under Other keymaps cateogery
Expected results:
sindhi inscript keymap should be listed under its own language category.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 441796] new gdm needs translation updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441796
Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini(a)cs.helsinki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vpivaini(a)cs.helsinki.fi
--- Comment #9 from Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini(a)cs.helsinki.fi> 2008-11-29 13:12:21 EDT ---
If at all possible, please pull in updated translations from GNOME SVN. I'm
using the Finnish translation (fi.po) and the po file shipped with Fedora 10's
gdm-2.24.0-12.fc10.i386 has only 182 messages when
http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/gdm.HEAD/gdm.HEAD.fi.po has 241 messages.
There's also a translation bug fixed in the current fi.po. "Restart" was
translated incorrectly into Finnish as "Restart GDM". That has been fixed in
GNOME SVN.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
--- Comment #18 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 22:40:00 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Comment #19 from Răzvan Sandu <razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro> 2008-11-28 16:04:33 EDT ---
Hello,
I'm able to confirm that this bug about inconsistent settings in the
/etc/sysconfig tree is still present in the *official* release of Fedora 10,
somewhere between preupgrade and anaconda.
Please follow the following steps to verify (I've experienced this personally
on a number of machines running F9):
1. Take a pre-F10 Fedora system (stock install), in default runlevel 3;
2. Using the standard tools in Gnome's System menu, configure the keyboard for
Romanian. The file /etc/sysconfig keyboard will now contain the line:
KEYTABLE="ro_win"
3. Using preupgrade-cli, ask system to upgrade to "Fedora 10 (Cambridge)";
official repositories content as in the state of November 28, 2008.
4. First stage of preupgrade will perform smoothly.
5. Reboot.
6. After reboot, preupgrade will try to start anaconda.
7. Just before the first graphics screen, upgrade will exit unexpectedly
(system will offer the possibility to reboot); the presence of "ro_win" in the
above line, which is now "unknown", is explicitly invoked as the reason of
failure;
8. Reboot system, entering in the the old version of distro (functional).
9. Modify system's keyboard setting to "English (US)", using the standard tools
in the System menu;
10. Reboot again; try to resume preupgrade.
11. Upgrade will fail again, for the same reason as in step 7.
Thanks,
Răzvan
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429104] scim-anthy (kanji/kana) input regression
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429104
--- Comment #14 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-26 04:27:34 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora
'version' of '8'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this
bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version,
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months