[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466410] New: [sd_IN] Include Sindhi Inscript keymap in ibus-m17n
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [sd_IN] Include Sindhi Inscript keymap in ibus-m17n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466410
Summary: [sd_IN] Include Sindhi Inscript keymap in ibus-m17n
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus-m17n
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
missing /usr/share/ibus/engine/m17n-sd-inscript.engine
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081009-1.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.try to see Sindhi language in ibus-setup
2.
3.
Actual results:
missing Sindhi Inscript keymap selection
Expected results:
should be able to add Sindhi inscript keymap
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471732] New: Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna even Canna user is NOT listed within uidgid setup file
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna even Canna user is NOT listed within uidgid setup file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471732
Summary: Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna even Canna user is
NOT listed within uidgid setup file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: Canna
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ovasik(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Canna claims explicit uid 39 without listing Canna user within oficial uidgid
file. This could cause troubles when uid 39 is already in use on the system. Is
there any need for that explicit uid 39? If so, it should have been requested
to be added into uidgid file in setup package(no such requested filled in
bugzilla so far).
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See /usr/share/doc/setup-*/uidgid
Actual results:
No Canna user within uidgid file
Expected results:
Canna user within uidgid file OR Canna user WITHOUT explicit uid request.
Additional info:
Just for your info, I'm setup package maintainer and there is very few number
of uid/gids left under 100. Recently was requested to add audio and video group
to Fedora, I have chosen two gid numbers - and one of those was 39 ... so
without my initiative and google search for possible usage of this uid/gid it
would have been taken without any warning and canna will be no longer running
correctly. Please let me know if this explicit requirement is really needed
(and canna user should be added to uidgid file - or if that uidgid number could
be used (and explicit number uid 39 could be removed from canna))
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429480] translate-toolkit has broken deps in epel5 testing
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429480
Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> 2008-11-17 08:21:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well, python-enchant needs enchant to build, which is not branched for EL-5.
> That's the reason python-enchant is not built.
It seems that enchant has been built but python-enchant remains unbuilt.
For now I've removed the dependency in translate-toolkit see:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/translate-toolkit/EL-5/translate-
toolkit.spec?r1=1.12&r2=1.13
The consequence is that spell checking in the pofilter tests will not work. The
Toolkit already handles a missing python-enchant, so no problems expected.
We can reenable python-enchant support when EL-5 packages get built.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months