[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 514852] New: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514852
Summary: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately
after IBus installation
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: im-chooser
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: harshula(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
* im-chooser-1.2.6-3.fc11.x86_64
How reproducible:
* Once. But I suspect if you uninstall IBus and reinstall it, you would be able
to reproduce it.
Steps to Reproduce:
0. Upgrade from F10 to F11.
1. Open IM chooser and only see SCIM mentioned with "(recommended)" next to it.
2. yum groupinstall sinhala-support
3. Re-open IM chooser (I can't remember if I closed it before (2) or after (2))
Actual results:
* im-chooser states: "Use SCIM (recommended)" and "Use IBus (recommended)"
Expected results:
* im-chooser stating: "Use SCIM" and "Use IBus (recommended)"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 500760] New: UI bug of "Enable input method" checkbox
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: UI bug of "Enable input method" checkbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500760
Summary: UI bug of "Enable input method" checkbox
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus-pinyin
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: lili(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jlaska(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=343902)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343902)
UI of ibus
Description of problem:
In"Enable input method" checkbox,some words are not clear, have some empty
string in the sentence
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Choose System->Preferences->Input Method (or run im-chooser)
2. "Enable input method" checkbox pops up
3. check the UI ,see more from attached image.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 497946] New: ibus-daemon should not fail silently
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-daemon should not fail silently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497946
Summary: ibus-daemon should not fail silently
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
ibus-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11
Currently ibus-daemon can fail to startup under certain circumstances like
socket directory owned by another user. It currently fails silently, so the
user has no idea why it failed.
ibus-daemon should pop-up and tell the user it failed to start, and why.
ibus-daemon should probably run:
ibus-x11 --fail "fail message here"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 523945] New: [as_IN] Date Data Mixed with % sign for each date
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [as_IN] Date Data Mixed with % sign for each date
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523945
Summary: [as_IN] Date Data Mixed with % sign for each date
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: system-config-date
AssignedTo: nphilipp(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: nphilipp(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=361475)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361475)
Screenshot for Date with % sign
Description of problem:
for Assamese Language, Each Date is mixed with % sign, when you run
'system-config-date'
in Assamese locale. it is shown like
2% 3% 4%
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tzdata-2009k-3.fc12.noarch
glibc-2.10.90-22.x86_64
system-config-date-1.9.49-1.fc12.noarch
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. change locale as 'export LANG=as_IN.UTF-8'
2. run application 'system-config-date'
3.
Actual results:
Date is shown with % sign (screen-shot attached)
Expected results:
Should without % Sign
Additional info:
Screenshot
Not very sure which package it belongs, so start with 's-c-date'
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526420] New: [ml_IN] - Window title appearing with underline for smc-meera-font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] - Window title appearing with underline for smc-meera-font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526420
Summary: [ml_IN] - Window title appearing with underline for
smc-meera-font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: gnome-themes
AssignedTo: mclasen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mclasen(a)redhat.com, apeter(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, smc-discuss(a)googlegroups.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=363141)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363141)
Screenshot for Meera with default Fedora theme
Description of problem:
For any editor e.g. oowriter, gedit, when smc-meera-font is used with "fedora"
(default) theme and "glossy" theme, underline sppears below the title, making
the window look ugly.
Screenshots of Meera with both themes attached.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
metacity-2.28.0-1.fc12.i686
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login system with malayalam locale. (ml_IN)
2. Go to System --> Preferences --> Appearance
3. Select Theme as "glossy"
4. Open and observe any editor or the theme window title itself.
Actual results:
The Underline appears on the Title Window with meera font and clearlooks
combination.
Expected results:
Underline should not appear.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526396] New: [ml_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526396
Summary: [ml_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for
smc-meera-font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme
AssignedTo: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org, apeter(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=363117)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363117)
The affected theme snapshot with meera font
Description of problem:
For any editor e.g. oowriter, gedit, when smc-meera-font is selected, its
showing underline below the Title, making the editor look ugly.
Seems a clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme bug.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
metacity-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login system with malayalam locale. (ml_IN)
2. Go to System --> Preferences --> Appearance
3. Select Theme as "Clearlooks"
4. Open and Observe any editor or the theme window title itself.
Actual results:
The Underline appears on the Title Window with meera font and clearlooks
combination.
Expected results:
Underline should not appear.
Additional info:
Its OK with all other ml_IN font and other themes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 504270] New: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270
Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are
wrong.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: smaitra(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
GSUB shape with SSA (0C37) and HA (0C39) is showing wrong in the font.
Its positioning for the lower part of the composed character, should be
below-right aligned which is now aligned as below-middle.
As of now The Image that is given to our Internal web page, is hand drawn and
partly wrong also. But, the lower part alignment is Perfect there which is
showing right-aligned.
These specific Combinations are given below :
68. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C37 త్ష TA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
70. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C39 త్హ TA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must
be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at
the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
103. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C37 న్ష NA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
105. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 న్హ NA + HALANT + HA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
140. U+0C2E U+0C4D U+0C39 మ్హ MA + HALANT + HA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
175. U+0C2F U+0C4D U+0C39 య్హ YA + HALANT + HA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
208. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C37 ర్ష RA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
210. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C39 ర్హ RA + HALANT + HA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
243. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C37 ల్ష LA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
245. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C39 ల్హ LA + HALANT + HA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
278. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C37 వ్ష VA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
280. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C39 వ్హ VA + HALANT + HA => In image main character
must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is
at the bottom) should be corrected as in image.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start system with FC11 or Latest
2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE
3. Open Gedit
4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above.
5. Observe the lower part of the composed character.
Actual results:
Its showing below-middle alignment.
Expected results:
It should be below-right alignment.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526359] New: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526359
Summary: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: low
Component: ibus-rawcode
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: webmaster(a)aus-city.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ibus.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package ibus-anthy.i586 0:1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kasumi for package:
ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586
---> Package ibus-gtk.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586
---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package ibus-pinyin.noarch 0:1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: python-enchant for package:
ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package:
ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586
---> Package kasumi.i586 0:2.4-2.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package python-enchant.i586 0:1.3.1-4.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package
ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 (installed)
ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package
ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 (installed)
ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package
ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 (installed)
ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package
ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 (installed)
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: ibus-libs = 1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 for package:
ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.1 for package:
ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586
--> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.1 for package:
ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: ibus-libs = 1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 is needed by
package ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates)
ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.1 is needed by package
ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates)
ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.1 is needed by package
ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates)
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ibus.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0 for package:
ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch
--> Processing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0.20090904 for package:
ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586
---> Package ibus-gtk.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch from updates has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0 is needed by package
ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch (updates)
ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0.20090904 is needed by package
ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 (updates)
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates
ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from updates
ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates
ibus-libs-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates
ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch from updates
kasumi-2.4-2.fc11.i586 from fedora
python-enchant-1.3.1-4.fc11.i586 from fedora
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526373] New: Please build it with ibus-1.2.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please build it with ibus-1.2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526373
Summary: Please build it with ibus-1.2.0
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus-sayura
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: phuang(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
I have updated ibus to 1.2.0 for f11. Please update this package too. Thanks.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-09-30 18:40:37 EDT ---
I need to look at it some more (got distracted by other bug requests, and this
is a complex package), however here are some remarks
1. rpm will evaluate your %global even with # (why did you want to comment it
out?)
2. common_desc should be a global too
3. your -fixed subpackage contains font files that declare themselves as
"Console". These should go in a "console" subpackage
4. not too sure if it'd be better to move console8x8 in its own subpackage or
just rename or remap it (cf remapping template)
5. You can drop the duplicated
Group: Applications/System
lines, the main one will be inherited in modern rpm
6. why do you add a Requires(pre): fontconfig ? We do not require fontconfig in
font packages. Do you have a special need?
7. what do you need xorg-x11-font-utils as BR for ?
8. I think you can specify a different LICENSE field per subpackage, can you
check with spot how he'd prefer the licensing reported ? (mixed licensing
packages are a PITA) I feel if it'd be better if each subpackage was tagged
with just the necessary license info (and included the corresponding license
files)
9. fontconfig will happily use pcf.gz files, please compress your pcf files (if
you're feeling ambitious ask behdad if he intends to support pcf.xz soon)
That's all for this first partial review, will look more in depth tomorrow
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months