September 2009 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526377] Depsolving problem with latest updates (ibus and rubygem-activerecord)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526377 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adrin.jalali(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2009-09-30 12:00:43 EDT --- *** Bug 526417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526417] New: update problem

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: update problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526417 Summary: update problem Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: adrin.jalali(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora # yum update 'ibus*' Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus.x86_64 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-anthy.x86_64 0:1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: kasumi for package: ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.x86_64 ---> Package ibus-chewing.x86_64 0:1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-gtk.x86_64 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.x86_64 ---> Package ibus-libs.x86_64 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-pinyin.noarch 0:1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: python-enchant for package: ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch ---> Package ibus-rawcode.x86_64 0:1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) for package: ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.x86_64 ---> Package kasumi.x86_64 0:2.4-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package python-enchant.x86_64 0:1.3.1-4.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.x86_64 (updates) ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.x86_64 (installed) ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.x86_64 (updates) ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.x86_64 (updates) Error: Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.x86_64 (updates) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526377] Depsolving problem with latest updates (ibus and rubygem-activerecord)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526377 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michal(a)harddata.com --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2009-09-30 12:00:37 EDT --- *** Bug 526358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526358] New: ibus update for F11 breaks dependencies

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus update for F11 breaks dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526358 Summary: ibus update for F11 breaks dependencies Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: michal(a)harddata.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 packages from the last update provide libibus.so.1. But currently available ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090818-1.fc11 ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11 ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11 (and at least those but maybe something more) require libibus.so.0. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-30 07:18:47 EDT --- also as commented by Jens in comment #11 IMO we should plan from that direction also, otherwise it looks bad two Packages providing same Set of Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-30 07:16:40 EDT --- yep, font name appearing just instead of bitmap-fangsong-ti-fonts it is bitmap-fangsongti-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-09-30 05:34:07 EDT --- I'll look at it this evening. Please make sure the font name appears in the package name (ucs-fixed-fonts, bitmap-fangsong-ti-fonts, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-30 04:58:59 EDT --- pasting review comment from bug 481068, pasting only important one --------------------------------------------------- Comment #8 From Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net) 2009-09-21 17:42:02 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Private Well fc-scan shows that most of the bdf files declare themselves as "Fixed", two of them think they are "Fangsong ti" and the others are not parsable by fc-scan. So you need at minimum a 1. a foo-fixed-fonts subpackage, 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, 3. and get Behdad to look at the other files and tell you if it's a bug his side or if the files need some form of fixing. Fontconfig won't be able to use them if it can't read the font name inside. The readme says they are Lucida but fontconfig does not read readmes. Also - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package - the licensing of Fangsong ti needs to be extracted from the fonts in a .txt people can actually read. Comment #13 From Pravin Satpute (psatpute(a)redhat.com) 2009-09-29 05:29:03 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Private sorry for bit late update fc-scan works fine on all *.pcf files i have done suggested changes updated spec and srpm are as follows http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts-0.3-10.fc11.src... also created a new package request for ucs-fixed-fonts bug 526204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526377] Depsolving problem with latest updates (ibus and rubygem-activerecord)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526377 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-30 03:42:05 EDT --- ibus updates are on their way: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ibus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-30 03:41:46 EDT --- i have build bitmap-fonts-0_3-9_fc12, with spec submitted in comment #6 better to do update bitmap-fonts with merge review for F13 and also looks good to close this f12-blocker bug and do discussion on Merge Review on bug 225617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs September 2009