Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581
Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining
Diacritical Marks.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: adam.buchbinder(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020911 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.6
According to the bug on freedesktop.org (link below), Liberation Mono has an
incorrect spacing definition for "Combining Diacritical Marks"; they should
have zero space, and should render above the last letter, not the next one.
Paste following text with selected font:
Correct: accent above o
Incorrect: accent above g
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enter a string with a combining diacritic mark in Liberation Mono, e.g.,
"o̍g". Don't use gnome-terminal; it relies on vte, which doesn't handle
combining characters. Use something like gedit; switching fonts will reveal the
issue as the diacritical mark switches places.
Actual Results:
The diacritic appears one letter to the right of where it should be.
Expected Results:
The diacritic should appear in the proper place.
I'm using ttf-liberation 1.04.93-1 on Ubuntu Intrepid; I'm filing this as an
upstream bug. If this should be filed elsewhere, please let me know.
I'm filing this because several monospace fonts have incorrect spacing for
"Combining Diacritical Marks":
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20330
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus needs to support some xkb layout switching
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541492
Summary: ibus needs to support some xkb layout switching
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Currently we have a mixture of xkb layout config and input methods
on the desktop: even some input methods maps are just made to
avoid xkb setting/configuration issues etc. And there is a
gnome keyboard indicator/switcher applet for changing layout.
This makes for a confusing UX and UI. If ibus could handle
this better it might even make sense to run ibus by default
for xkb switching too at least.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: system-config-date-docs need to be updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526634
Summary: system-config-date-docs need to be updated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Translation
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: system-config-date-docs
AssignedTo: nphilipp(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: nphilipp(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=363281)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363281)
Screenshot for chapter "Time and Date Properties"
Description of problem:
The current help file (system-config-date-docs) for system-config-date in
rawhide, contains a section called "Network Time Protocol (NTP) Properties".
Also the screenshots in the file contains the tab for NTP. But the actual UI of
system-config-date does not show NTP Properties Tab. Guess the doc file has not
been updated. Screenshot attached.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-date-1.9.50-1.fc12.noarch
system-config-date-docs-1.0.8-1.fc12.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Run system-config-date as root.
2.Click on the Help button shown on left bottom.
3.Observe all three screenshots in all the chapters and the chapter named
"Network Time Protocol (NTP) Properties".
Actual results:
The doc file shows details for NTP.
Expected results:
No NTP details are required as per current system-config-date.
Additional info:
Screenshots attached.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551
Summary: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:87031497776eb697f15e9313fe995dfcbfd21411
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: atgf0127(a)126.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.3 detected a crash.
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: python /usr/share/ibus/ui/gtk/main.py
component: ibus
executable: /usr/bin/python
kernel: 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE
package: ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process was terminated by signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549295
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:159699374710fe1f59b21b22fb7c9005a2e00e39
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: m_runwal(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.0 detected a crash.
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon --xim
component: ibus
executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon
kernel: 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.i686
package: ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process was terminated by signal 11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in transifex-0.6-3.fc12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544085
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in transifex-0.6-3.fc12
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7d935e6f
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: transifex
AssignedTo: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: gmathisz(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com, diegobz(a)gmail.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.0 detected a crash.
How to reproduce
-----
1.as user from the terminal
2. ./manage.py syncdb
3.
Comment: I was trying to configure transifex
backtrace
-----
Summary: TB7d935e6f base.py:170:_cursor:OperationalError: unable to open
database file
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./manage.py", line 20, in <module>
execute_manager(settings)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 362, in execute_manager
utility.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 303, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
195, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
222, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line
351, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/syncdb.py",
line 49, in handle_noargs
cursor = connection.cursor()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/__init__.py", line
81, in cursor
cursor = self._cursor()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py",
line 170, in _cursor
self.connection = Database.connect(**kwargs)
OperationalError: unable to open database file
Local variables in innermost frame:
self: <django.db.backends.sqlite3.base.DatabaseWrapper object at 0x95139dc>
settings_dict: {'DATABASE_OPTIONS': {}, 'DATABASE_NAME':
'/usr/share/transifex/transifex.db.sqlite', 'TIME_ZONE': 'UTC',
'DATABASE_PORT': '', 'DATABASE_PASSWORD': '', 'DATABASE_HOST': '',
'DATABASE_USER': ''}
kwargs: {'detect_types': 3, 'database':
'/usr/share/transifex/transifex.db.sqlite'}
cmdline: python ./manage.py syncdb
component: transifex
executable: /usr/share/transifex/manage.py
kernel: 2.6.31.6-145.fc12.i686.PAE
package: transifex-0.6-3.fc12
uuid: 7d935e6f
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544933
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:ad1de4feea702b69ccbeb7d6bf069b78a22c1cb2
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: scim
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: m_runwal(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.0 detected a crash.
Comment: Just logged in and Got this crash report.
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk --display :0.0 -c socket -d --no-stay
component: scim
executable: /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk
kernel: 2.6.31.6-145.fc12.i686
package: scim-1.4.9-4.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process was terminated by signal 6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575
Summary: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process
/usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by
signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:317599895cb4f8238af79a785c10a695ffb090c8
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: scim
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dcwilbur(a)earthlink.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk --display :0.0 -c socket -d
--no-stay
component: scim
executable: /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk
kernel: 2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64
package: scim-1.4.9-4.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6
(SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575536
Summary: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal
11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:265ffdd16de4fba6d8a03306554c97189fb18add
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: scim
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: shinkoi2005(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk --display :0.0 -c socket -d --no-stay
component: scim
executable: /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk
kernel: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.i686.PAE
package: scim-1.4.9-4.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 11
(SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Follow upon the font packaging policy (fontconfig)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565386
Summary: Follow upon the font packaging policy (fontconfig)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Version: 6.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: culmus-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 565385
Group: rhel_beta
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Red Hat
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 565385
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #565385 +++
Description of problem:
Since 61-64 is reserved for the low priority LGC fonts, Hebrew font should be
moved to the range of 65-69.
Aside from that, there are no Generic names rule
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names) in any
fontconfig config files. every fonts should be assigned to either of
sans/sans-serif/monospace.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
culmus-fonts-0.104-1.fc13.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.