October 2013 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PXExZXnDL8&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NnJyO4rYjS&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 874356] New: [abrt] ibus-chewing-1.4.2-1.fc17: InitTree: Process /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874356 Bug ID: 874356 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Whiteboard: abrt_hash:456603e5179f4a7904843667c9dd5c13b50dfca5 Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Assignee: dchen(a)redhat.com Summary: [abrt] ibus-chewing-1.4.2-1.fc17: InitTree: Process /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: dses5211(a)gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: x86_64 Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: ibus-chewing Product: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-chewing-1.4.2-1.fc17 Additional info: libreport version: 2.0.18 abrt_version: 2.0.18 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing --ibus crash_function: InitTree kernel: 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 truncated backtrace: :Thread no. 1 (10 frames) : #4 InitTree at tree.c:121 : #5 chewing_Init at chewingio.c:159 : #6 ibus_chewing_engine_init at /usr/src/debug/ibus-chewing-1.3.10-Source/src/IBusChewingEngine.gob:252 : #7 g_type_create_instance at gtype.c:1892 : #8 g_object_constructor at gobject.c:1849 : #10 g_object_new_valist at gobject.c:1830 : #12 ibus_engine_new_with_type at ibusengine.c:1198 : #13 ibus_factory_real_create_engine at ibusfactory.c:117 : #14 _ibus_marshal_OBJECT__STRING at ibusmarshalers.c:838 : #19 ibus_factory_service_method_call at ibusfactory.c:264 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 766160] New: [abrt] ibus-chewing-1.3.10-1.fc16: __GI_raise: Process /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] ibus-chewing-1.3.10-1.fc16: __GI_raise: Process /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766160 Summary: [abrt] ibus-chewing-1.3.10-1.fc16: __GI_raise: Process /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e81c4cffe6d0dc56e1419a9da81029c991b464d4 Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ibus-chewing AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: scottt.tw(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Depends on: 756238 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- libreport version: 2.0.7 abrt_version: 2.0.6 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing --ibus comment: I was typing traditional Chinese with ibus-chewing and activating / un-activating ibus with CTRL-Space in the proprietary Google Chrome build on the Google+ website and ibus-engine-chewing somehow crashed. crash_function: __GI_raise executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing kernel: 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 pid: 31148 pwd: /tmp reason: Process /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) time: Sat 10 Dec 2011 03:59:18 AM CST uid: 500 username: scottt xsession_errors: backtrace: Text file, 20234 bytes build_ids: Text file, 2665 bytes dso_list: Text file, 6276 bytes maps: Text file, 164522 bytes smolt_data: Text file, 2792 bytes environ: :SHELL=/bin/bash :DBUS_STARTER_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-Fy8ROutbqs,guid=9de904bbd90bee778416721100000013 :XDG_SESSION_COOKIE=2321847de248bbc0238e912600000004-1320874087.662970-627674432 :XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/scottt :DISPLAY=:0 :DESKTOP_SESSION=gnome :SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/keyring-4gVTjR/ssh :SESSION_MANAGER=local/unix:@/tmp/.ICE-unix/2142,unix/unix:/tmp/.ICE-unix/2142 :WINDOWPATH=1 :PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin :GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID=this-is-deprecated :GDMSESSION=gnome :XDG_VTNR=1 :USERNAME=scottt :XDG_SESSION_ID=2 :GPG_AGENT_INFO=/tmp/keyring-4gVTjR/gpg:0:1 :DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-Fy8ROutbqs,guid=9de904bbd90bee778416721100000013 :XDG_SEAT=seat0 :XAUTHORITY=/var/run/gdm/auth-for-scottt-ublKgk/database :USER=scottt :DBUS_STARTER_BUS_TYPE=session :GNOME_KEYRING_PID=2137 :SHLVL=1 :PWD=/home/scottt :GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/tmp/keyring-4gVTjR :LANG=en_US.UTF-8 :_=/usr/bin/dbus-launch :LOGNAME=scottt :HOME=/home/scottt :LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 :GTK_IM_MODULE=ibus :QT_IM_MODULE=xim :XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus var_log_messages: :Dec 5 02:33:24 sd dbus-daemon[958]: (packagekitd:9074): PkPlugin-DEBUG: adding /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing pid:31148 uid:500 :Dec 6 21:19:49 sd dbus-daemon[958]: (packagekitd:32360): PkPlugin-DEBUG: adding /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing pid:31148 uid:500 :Dec 10 03:59:18 sd abrt[7817]: File '/usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing.#prelink#.xjbd6C' seems to be deleted :Dec 10 03:59:18 sd abrt[7817]: File '/usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing.#prelink#.xjbd6C' seems to be a prelink temporary file :Dec 10 03:59:19 sd abrt[7817]: Saved core dump of pid 31148 (/usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2011-12-10-03:59:18-31148 (107511808 bytes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts Short Description: Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font Owners: pnemade Branches: f20 f19 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7EMInb8OMv&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 --- Comment #16 from Yohan Graterol <yohangraterol92(a)gmail.com> --- You're welcome! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NI6ts9whOp&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 --- Comment #15 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xq1zcgPTys&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 Yohan Graterol <yohangraterol92(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0GE0dQKc6f&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 --- Comment #14 from Yohan Graterol <yohangraterol92(a)gmail.com> --- Of course, perfect. Don't worry for the warnings. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts-1.002-0.1.20130214.fc21.noarch.rpm google-crosextra-caladea-fonts-1.002-0.1.20130214.fc21.src.rpm google-crosextra-caladea-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation google-crosextra-caladea-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/crosextrafonts-... HTTP Error 405: Method Not Allowed 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint google-crosextra-caladea-fonts google-crosextra-caladea-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- google-crosextra-caladea-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh config(google-crosextra-caladea-fonts) fontpackages-filesystem Provides -------- google-crosextra-caladea-fonts: config(google-crosextra-caladea-fonts) font(:lang=aa) font(:lang=af) font(:lang=an) font(:lang=ay) font(:lang=bi) font(:lang=br) font(:lang=bs) font(:lang=ca) font(:lang=ch) font(:lang=co) font(:lang=crh) font(:lang=cs) font(:lang=csb) font(:lang=cy) font(:lang=da) font(:lang=de) font(:lang=en) font(:lang=eo) font(:lang=es) font(:lang=et) font(:lang=eu) font(:lang=fi) font(:lang=fil) font(:lang=fj) font(:lang=fo) font(:lang=fr) font(:lang=fur) font(:lang=fy) font(:lang=gd) font(:lang=gl) font(:lang=gn) font(:lang=gv) font(:lang=ho) font(:lang=hr) font(:lang=hsb) font(:lang=ht) font(:lang=hu) font(:lang=ia) font(:lang=id) font(:lang=ie) font(:lang=io) font(:lang=is) font(:lang=it) font(:lang=jv) font(:lang=ki) font(:lang=kj) font(:lang=kl) font(:lang=ku-tr) font(:lang=kwm) font(:lang=la) font(:lang=lb) font(:lang=lg) font(:lang=li) font(:lang=lt) font(:lang=lv) font(:lang=mg) font(:lang=mh) font(:lang=ms) font(:lang=mt) font(:lang=na) font(:lang=nb) font(:lang=nds) font(:lang=ng) font(:lang=nl) font(:lang=nn) font(:lang=no) font(:lang=nr) font(:lang=nso) font(:lang=ny) font(:lang=oc) font(:lang=om) font(:lang=pap-an) font(:lang=pap-aw) font(:lang=pl) font(:lang=pt) font(:lang=rm) font(:lang=rn) font(:lang=rw) font(:lang=sc) font(:lang=se) font(:lang=sg) font(:lang=sk) font(:lang=sl) font(:lang=sma) font(:lang=smj) font(:lang=smn) font(:lang=sn) font(:lang=so) font(:lang=sq) font(:lang=ss) font(:lang=st) font(:lang=su) font(:lang=sv) font(:lang=sw) font(:lang=tk) font(:lang=tl) font(:lang=tn) font(:lang=tr) font(:lang=ts) font(:lang=uz) font(:lang=vo) font(:lang=vot) font(:lang=wa) font(:lang=wen) font(:lang=wo) font(:lang=xh) font(:lang=yap) font(:lang=za) font(:lang=zu) font(caladea) google-crosextra-caladea-fonts ------------------------------------ PACKAGE APPROVED ------------------------------------ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4bTvdaqZve&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1017766] Review Request: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766 --- Comment #13 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- When upstream does not provide license of the project in its own text file then we can see inside source files as well as upstream url. 1) $otfinfo -i Caladea-*.ttf | grep License Caladea-BoldItalic.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-BoldItalic.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 Caladea-Bold.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-Bold.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 Caladea-Italic.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-Italic.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 Caladea-Regular.ttf:License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Caladea-Regular.ttf:License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 2) Upstream URL http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=168879 but there is no mention of license but if you see the Carlito font URL http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=280557 then there you will find the text "Carlito is licensed under OFL 1.1 and cannot be bundled into the crosextrafonts package with Caladea licensed under Apache." So using both above references one can conclude license for this Caladea font is ASL 2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bLLz9hQRZR&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs October 2013