[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1226831] New: /etc/fonts/fonts.conf claims it references local.conf but it does not
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226831
Bug ID: 1226831
Summary: /etc/fonts/fonts.conf claims it references local.conf
but it does not
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Attempting to fix broken fonts in my terminal after upgrade to Fedora 22, I
read various documentation about how fonts are supposed to be configured these
days. One of the sources of wisdom are:
# head -22 /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file to configure system font access -->
<fontconfig>
<!--
DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED.
LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'.
The intent of this standard configuration file is to be adequate for
most environments. If you have a reasonably normal environment and
have found problems with this configuration, they are probably
things that others will also want fixed. Please submit any
problems to the fontconfig bugzilla system located at fontconfig.org
Note that the normal 'make install' procedure for fontconfig is to
replace any existing fonts.conf file with the new version. Place
any local customizations in local.conf which this file references.
Keith Packard
-->
However, there are no references to local.conf in fonts.conf beyond this
initial documentation:
# grep local.conf /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'.
any local customizations in local.conf which this file references.
#
Please fix this documentation/warning snippet to show valid configuration
locations.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qf /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
fontconfig-2.11.93-2.fc22.x86_64
How reproducible:
Deterministic.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempt to configure fonts.
2. Read the documentation at the top of /etc/fonts/fonts.conf.
3. Place customization to /etc/fonts/local.conf.
4. Wonder why the changes are not reflected in any way.
5. Check if fonts.conf references local.conf like it promises to do.
Actual results:
It does not -- documentation and reality mismatch.
Expected results:
It does, or better yet -- the documentation at the top of the file points the
user to /etc/fonts/conf.d or similar location that is actually referenced by
<include ...> in /etc/fonts/fonts.conf.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3hEi6YZCrj&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 11 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1187528] [gnome-terminal] blurred rendering of PCF fonts after update of fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187528
--- Comment #27 from LiuYan <lovetide(a)qq.com> ---
(In reply to Marco Giunta from comment #26)
> (In reply to Joachim Frieben from comment #22)
> > Do not install package terminus-fonts system-wide but extract the PCF files
> > and copy one file alone to $HOME/.fonts in increasing order removing the
> > previous one. The right one will looks crisp at the desired size. This
> > enabled me to use my favourite terminal (bitmap) font even under fedora 22.
>
> Same problem here, after F22 upgrade: I'm using Terminus fonts and with
> Joachim Frieben's trick now I'm able to use it with 'gnome-terminal' and
> 'gedit'
It works for me too. But instead, I copyied 2 files with same size (ter-116n &
ter-116b) to /usr/share/fonts/terminus. If I copied ter-x??? fonts too, it
still works, but if I copied ter-1?? fonts of other sizes, it will blur again.
so weird...
Btw, terminus fonts in Fedora 22 only displayed as bitmap style only if the
font-size is between 8pt to 10pt, other sizes will displayed blurred (using
greyscale antialiasing).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YDouzz5lDt&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 11 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 812207] New: La (=?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B2?=) and Sha (=?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B6?=) half shape required modifications
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: La (ल) and Sha (श) half shape required modifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812207
Summary: La (ल) and Sha (श) half shape required modifications
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: lohit-marathi-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 577228
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=577228
pdf explaining problem
Description of problem:
Mail from Sushant Devlekar, Half La (ल) and Sha (श) shape required
modifications as done by Base shape of La (ल) and Sha (श)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-marathi-fonts-2.5.1-1
How reproducible:
everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Type ल्ल and श्क
2.
3.
Actual results:
half shape of sha and la not matching with full shape of la and sha
Expected results:
both full and half shape should match.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 11 months