[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1750891] New: font cache not getting update on Silverblue 31?
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750891
Bug ID: 1750891
Summary: font cache not getting update on Silverblue 31?
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I have this system state
[parag@localhost ~]$ rpm-ostree status
State: idle
AutomaticUpdates: disabled
Deployments:
● ostree://fedora:fedora/31/x86_64/silverblue
Version: 31.20190909.n.0 (2019-09-09T08:24:14Z)
BaseCommit:
093a07e18c0514e47e978c9c33ef73a2615117db343e0eef7218c298b1e3502c
GPGSignature: Valid signature by
7D22D5867F2A4236474BF7B850CB390B3C3359C4
LayeredPackages: gedit gnome-tweaks hunspell-hi langpacks-hi
libreoffice-core
ostree://fedora:fedora/31/x86_64/silverblue
Version: 31.20190909.n.0 (2019-09-09T08:24:14Z)
BaseCommit:
093a07e18c0514e47e978c9c33ef73a2615117db343e0eef7218c298b1e3502c
GPGSignature: Valid signature by
7D22D5867F2A4236474BF7B850CB390B3C3359C4
LayeredPackages: gedit gnome-tweaks hunspell-hi libreoffice-core
[parag@localhost ~]$ rpm-ostree db diff
ostree diff commit from: rollback deployment
(0ad271d38c5aa4e1ce194ea625f83862d2c317774d96ba9b94d53c5324133265)
ostree diff commit to: booted deployment
(61f7aea98b458e53e42e85131e62ad7c84f80592676f28949cc5aa411e34ff55)
Added:
glibc-langpack-hi-2.30-1.fc31.x86_64
google-noto-sans-devanagari-ui-vf-fonts-20181223-6.fc31.noarch
google-noto-sans-devanagari-vf-fonts-20181223-6.fc31.noarch
hyphen-hi-1:0.7.0-14.fc31.noarch
langpacks-core-hi-2.0-6.fc31.noarch
langpacks-hi-2.0-6.fc31.noarch
libreoffice-help-hi-1:6.3.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64
libreoffice-langpack-hi-1:6.3.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64
samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.2-22.fc31.noarch
samyak-fonts-common-1.2.2-22.fc31.noarch
[parag@localhost ~]$ fc-list :lang=hi
/usr/share/fonts/lohit-devanagari/Lohit-Devanagari.ttf: Lohit
Devanagari:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf: Droid
Sans:style=Regular
[parag@localhost ~]$
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.92-2.fc31.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. on F31, install any langpacks which will install additional fonts packages
like langpacks-hi
2. execute fc-list :lang=hi
3.
Actual results:
"fc-list :lang=hi" output remained same
Expected results:
"fc-list :lang=hi" should included rencently installed font packages as well
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1770450] New: Fontconfig warning: "/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample.conf", line 6: unknown element "reset-dirs"
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770450
Bug ID: 1770450
Summary: Fontconfig warning:
"/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample
.conf", line 6: unknown element "reset-dirs"
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lhaastdaiz(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
When upgrading to fontconfig-2.13.1-9.fc30.x86_64, dnf emits this warning:
Fontconfig warning:
"/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample.conf", line 6: unknown
element "reset-dirs"
$ cat -n /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample.conf
1 <?xml version="1.0"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
3 <fontconfig>
4 <description>Re-define fonts dirs sample</description>
5
6 <reset-dirs />
7 <dir prefix="xdg">fonts</dir>
8
9 </fontconfig>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 10 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1767499] New: Very bad kerning for Tahoma in Fedora 31
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767499
Bug ID: 1767499
Summary: Very bad kerning for Tahoma in Fedora 31
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: aros(a)gmx.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1631087
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1631087&action=edit
Tahoma as rendered by Pango 1.44 in Fedora 31
This is how Tahoma font is rendered in Fedora 31.
After downgrading to pango-1.43.0-4.fc30.x86_64.rpm the issue disappears.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 11 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1737785] New: CVE-2019-1010238 pango: heap based buffer overflow can be used to get code execution
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737785
Bug ID: 1737785
Summary: CVE-2019-1010238 pango: heap based buffer overflow can
be used to get code execution
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mrehak(a)redhat.com
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
Gnome Pango 1.42 and later is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: The
heap based buffer overflow can be used to get code execution. The component is:
function name: pango_log2vis_get_embedding_levels, assignment of nchars and the
loop condition. The attack vector is: Bug can be used when application pass
invalid utf-8 strings to functions like pango_itemize.
External References:
https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153838/USN-4081-1.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1766554] New: [abrt] stardict: g_type_check_instance_cast(): stardict killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766554
Bug ID: 1766554
Summary: [abrt] stardict: g_type_check_instance_cast():
stardict killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:5cf2cd39fc416e272716f2eb0f77e4d5284fe46b;VAR
IANT_ID=workstation;
Component: stardict
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: viktar_siarheichyk(a)epam.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: anish.developer(a)gmail.com,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Version-Release number of selected component:
stardict-3.0.6-12.fc30
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.10.1
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: stardict
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_cast
executable: /usr/bin/stardict
journald_cursor:
s=f0aac7fcdfad43228e20c09dae141664;i=5f22c;b=1e80a38b7b604a3192855143705cdc2d;m=2335667c1;t=5960abe948f7d;x=9e8c5aa0ed83d3fe
kernel: 5.3.7-200.fc30.x86_64
rootdir: /
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
#0 g_type_check_instance_cast at ../gobject/gtype.c:4057
#1 DictManageDlg::Show at dictmanagedlg.cpp:2803
#2 AppCore::PopupDictManageDlg() at stardict.cpp:1967
#7 gtk_real_button_released at gtkbutton.c:1712
#12 gtk_button_button_release at gtkbutton.c:1604
#14 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED at gtkmarshalers.c:84
#19 gtk_widget_event_internal at gtkwidget.c:5017
#20 gtk_widget_event at gtkwidget.c:4814
#21 gtk_propagate_event at gtkmain.c:2503
#22 gtk_main_do_event at gtkmain.c:1698
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1739051] New: tomoe-gtk depends on Python 2
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739051
Bug ID: 1739051
Summary: tomoe-gtk depends on Python 2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: tomoe-gtk
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: lbalhar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dingyichen(a)gmail.com, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1698500 (F31_PY2REMOVAL)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Python 2.7 will reach end-of-life in January 2020, over 9 years after it was
released. This falls within the Fedora 31 lifetime.
Packages that depend on Python 2 are being switched to Python 3 or removed from
Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31_Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal#...
Python 2 will be retired in Fedora 32:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython2
To help planning, we'd like to know the plans for tomoe-gtk's future.
Specifically:
- What is the reason for the Python2 dependency? (Is it software written in
Python, or does it just provide Python bindings, or use Python in the build
system or test runner?)
- What are the upstream/community plans/timelines regarding Python 3?
- What is the guidance for porting to Python 3? (Assuming that there is someone
who generally knows how to port to Python 3, but doesn't know anything about
the particular package, what are the next steps to take?)
This bug is filed semi-automatically, and might not have all the context
specific to tomoe-gtk.
If you need anything from us, or something is unclear, please mention it here.
Thank you.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698500
[Bug 1698500] F31 Mass Python 2 Package Removal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1711631] New: [abrt] ibus-libpinyin: pinyin_save(pinyin_context_t*)(): ibus-engine-libpinyin killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711631
Bug ID: 1711631
Summary: [abrt] ibus-libpinyin:
pinyin_save(pinyin_context_t*)():
ibus-engine-libpinyin killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:2907b6d4b730ec4a10a6bea50fea98c87d3a4241;VAR
IANT_ID=workstation;
Component: ibus-libpinyin
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: leftmostcat(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Version-Release number of selected component:
ibus-libpinyin-1.11.0-2.fc30
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.10.0
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-libpinyin --ibus
crash_function: pinyin_save(pinyin_context_t*)
executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-libpinyin
journald_cursor:
s=f9047c3871b9426fb1457b843e4962ba;i=2be43;b=a2c85faaa45f4919a598643806057a19;m=10704f78ad;t=58937579e8528;x=34c91ce58520a188
kernel: 5.0.16-300.fc30.x86_64
rootdir: /
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (4 frames)
#0 pinyin_save(pinyin_context_t*) at pinyin.cpp:736
#1 PY::LibPinyinBackEnd::clearPinyinUserData(char const*) at
PYLibPinyin.cc:307
#2 PY::PinyinConfig::valueChanged(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&,
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >
const&, _GVariant*) at /usr/include/c++/9/bits/basic_string.h:2297
#3 PY::LibPinyinConfig::valueChangedCallback(_GSettings*, char const*,
PY::LibPinyinConfig*) at /usr/include/c++/9/bits/char_traits.h:300
Potential duplicate: bug 1579078
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1748187] New: cannot install the best update candidate for package liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-3.fc30.noarch
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748187
Bug ID: 1748187
Summary: cannot install the best update candidate for package
liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-3.fc30.noarch
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-narrow-fonts
Severity: high
Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Reporter: sascha(a)peilicke.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
$ sudo dnf upgrade --best --allowerasing --skip-broken
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:01 ago on Di 03 Sep 2019 08:17:06 CEST.
Error:
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-3.fc30.noarch
- cannot install both liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-1.fc30.noarch and
liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-3.fc30.noarch
- problem with installed package liberation-narrow-fonts-1.07.6-1.fc30.noarch
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
liberation-narrow-fonts-1.07.6-1.fc30.noarch
$ dnf list installed | grep liberation
liberation-fonts.noarch 1:2.00.5-3.fc30 @updates
liberation-fonts-common.noarch 1:2.00.5-3.fc30 @updates
liberation-mono-fonts.noarch 1:2.00.5-3.fc30 @updates
liberation-narrow-fonts.noarch 1.07.6-1.fc30 @fedora
liberation-sans-fonts.noarch 1:2.00.5-3.fc30 @updates
liberation-serif-fonts.noarch 1:2.00.5-3.fc30 @updates
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1761089] New: Request to package fcitx and other fcitx libraries on EPEL 8
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761089
Bug ID: 1761089
Summary: Request to package fcitx and other fcitx libraries on
EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: fcitx
Assignee: liangsuilong(a)gmail.com
Reporter: jatin1812(a)protonmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i(a)cicku.me,
liangsuilong(a)gmail.com, pwu(a)redhat.com,
robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
We do have fcitx in EPEL 7 repos, RHEL 8/ CentOS 8 need fcitx in EPEL 8
repositories :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years