https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021739
Bug ID: 2021739
Summary: no fonts available in this package
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Hardware: noarch
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: japanese-bitmap-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: takemurafedora(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The size of all the font files (*.pcf.gz) are only 20 bites which are gziped
empty files. fonts.dir shows the number of fonts included in the directory is
0.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.20080710-29.fc35
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. check to see the fonts that should be proveded with xfontsel, xlsfonts, etc.
2.
3.
Actual results:
No fonts are available.
Expected results:
Many japanese fonts should be availabe from X.
Additional info:
Rebuilding failed with "Missing build dependency: perl", as perl-interpreter
does not provides perl, but /usr/bin/perl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021739
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029983
Bug ID: 2029983
Summary: Please branch and build anthy in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: anthy
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tdawson(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com,
tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build anthy in epel9.
If you do not wish to maintain anthy in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package.
I have tested and the rawhide package builds in EPEL9 without any changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029983
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026540
Bug ID: 2026540
Summary: ibus should own /var/cache/ibus
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Currently it seems /var/cache/ibus is not owned by any package.
I guess it is created at install time or runtime by ibus write-cache.
So either ibus could just include the directly explicitly or
%ghost it, so that it would be owned.
See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org…
about unowned /var/cache/ dirs, which prompted this report.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /var/cache/ibus
Actual results:
file /var/cache/ibus is not owned by any package
Expected results:
owned by ibus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026540