June 2022 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1625596] emoji input does not work in Live

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625596 --- Comment #15 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #14) > On the other hand Fedora currently suggests a minimum of 2GB for Workstation > (and recommends at least 4GB), > so I don't see the memory use is so serious a problem. I think the 2GB is mostly caused by GNOME desktop and I think the recommendation is not mandatory and my understanding is Fedora accepts users try lower memory systems. Seems you don't evaluate Unicode typing. Anyway, almost users don't need emoji typing in Live Image and the workaround is already provided. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625596

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1625596] emoji input does not work in Live

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625596 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- I did some more measurements: The minimum (initial) RSS is 31MB. After pressing Ctrl+Period RSS moves to 45MB. After starting the dialog with Space: RSS is 50MB, and having selected an emoji: RSS is 60MB. Looks like there may be a serious memory leak when moving through many emoji in the dialog with the cursor keys: then memory usage seems to grow and grow, even when returning to the same emoji category page it seems. Going into the Unicode tables further increases RSS. (Tested on a F36 WS Live image) I agree this is not great (on my own laptop it is using 50MB RSS, since I only use preedit emoji input). On the other hand Fedora currently suggests a minimum of 2GB for Workstation (and recommends at least 4GB), so I don't see the memory use is so serious a problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625596

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2102301] New: harfbuzz-4.4.1 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102301 Bug ID: 2102301 Summary: harfbuzz-4.4.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: harfbuzz Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, moceap(a)hotmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.4.1 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.4.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.4.0-1.fc37 URL: https://harfbuzz.github.io/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1299/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/harfbuzz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102301

1 year, 10 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2101663] New: harfbuzz-4.4.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101663 Bug ID: 2101663 Summary: harfbuzz-4.4.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: harfbuzz Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, moceap(a)hotmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.4.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.4.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.3.0-1.fc37 URL: https://harfbuzz.github.io/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1299/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/harfbuzz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101663

1 year, 10 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #23 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> --- Yes, it fails to build. I need to rebase to 102 anyway so will look at it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- F36 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=88801391 (no firefox-langpacks) I am not able to scratch build for F37 (should have firefox-langpacks) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- I updated my PR again - maybe I can test it on F36... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Martin Stransky from comment #16) > Thanks. Yes, we need it as system wide change for Fedora 37 due to weak > dependency used. > Also we use the same firefox.spec file for all Fedoras so please keep the > current langpacks scenario for Firefox < 37. > We commit to rawhide only and then merge to all other branches. Sure - I realised that needs more tweaking - I was mistaken on the status, sorry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Draft Change proposal is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firefox_Langpacks_Subpackage Do please have a look and feel free to improve it of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Martin Stransky from comment #16) > Thanks. Yes, we need it as system wide change for Fedora 37 due to weak > dependency used. > Also we use the same firefox.spec file for all Fedoras so please keep the > current langpacks scenario for Firefox < 37. > We commit to rawhide only and then merge to all other branches. Yep it is already done in my fork. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs June 2022