June 2022 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #17 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> --- Yes, please do the system wide change request form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #16 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks. Yes, we need it as system wide change for Fedora 37 due to weak dependency used. Also we use the same firefox.spec file for all Fedoras so please keep the current langpacks scenario for Firefox < 37. We commit to rawhide only and then merge to all other branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1625596] emoji input does not work in Live

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625596 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- If there is a problem, which I don't think there is, then you need to fix ibus. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625596

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #13) > I can update the patch to only make the subpackage for F37+ for now. Done in my latest commit cacf128 now. (Also note I earlier removed the changelog to avoid merge conflicts: let me know if you need one.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- BTW the deadline for F37 System Wide Changes is tomorrow. So if we wanted to do that it should ideally be submitted today even. I would be happy to write the draft and run it by you, if you like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Martin Stransky from comment #11) > How does it affect recent installations? Good question > Is it possible to ship that on F35/F36 too? Yes, I think it is possible, but honestly I would suggest to ship it first in F37. I can update the patch to only make the subpackage for F37+ for now. Then later once it looks good we could enable it for F36 and possibly F35. How does that sound? I think it would be good to get it into Rawhide soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Sorry, forgot to respond to this (In reply to Martin Stransky from comment #6) > How are the langpack rpm files created? Are they generated from the existing > firefox-langpacks-XXXX langpack source file? It is using the current Fedora files: there is no change in content (just rpm packaging). > I don't want to change how the package is updated in git as the update > process is fast and efficient (we upload only source + langpack file to git > and change version number). No change is needed as far as i can see -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #11 from Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com> --- How does it affect recent installations? Is it possible to ship that on F35/F36 too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- It might well make sense to announce this as a F37 System Wide Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2035178] suggestion: move langpacks to a firefox-langpacks subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Or you can take the patch from https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/pull-request/43.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035178

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs June 2022