https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667039
Caolan McNamara <caolanm(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com,
| |pnemade(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm(a)redhat.com> ---
The require as it currently stands just ensures that to install a
libreoffice-LANG you will also need a font that supports LANG without
prescribing what font that should be, so that the UI can at least be rendered
without missing glyphs. I think its impracticable and undesirable to maintain a
list of potentially ~70 fonts in libreoffice itself.
Before F30 dnf langpacks-LANG metapackages don't require any fonts, e.g.
rpm -q langpacks-th
langpacks-th-1.0-13.fc29.noarch
rpm -q --whatprovides "font(:lang=th)"
no package provides font(:lang=th)
And the only place we currently list the "best" fonts for a language are in
comps
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/blob/master/f/comps-f29.xml.in
But I see that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_...
targeted at F30 plans to change how this works.
caolanm->pnemade/peterson: I presume the replacement of comps with langpacks
isn't actually done yet and there isn't a tracker bug for it ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.