https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471924
--- Comment #16 from Scott Robbins <scottro11(a)gmail.com> ---
There are certainly times when ibus has worked perfectly for me. If I did a
fresh install and put in ibus, 9 times out of 10, it should work the way I want
it to.
This bug, though, is for adding fcitx. It's a bit like (in the old days)
saying we have pine, why do we need mutt?
I, and just about anyone who has used RH or CentOS for Japanese input,
certainly appreciate the hard work that has been done with ibus-anthy. I've
said problematic "for me", and also qualified that with at times. :)
With all due respect, whether ibus works or doesn't isn't that relevant to this
bug report. Yes, it usually works very well, but I prefer fcitx. As someone
once said in an old pine mutt debate, people pull up all sorts of technical
reasons to justify what is, in the end, an emotional decision. So, though I'm
not a subscriber and therefore am low priority, I have followed procedure and
requested a package that I want. Other packages that accomplish the same thing
are not really relevant to the discussion.
I certainly am grateful for your work on ibus which has enabled me to easily
input Japanese on CentOS for many years.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.