#107: Mass Removal Of Stagnant Voting Members
-----------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: dcr226 | Owner:
Type: feedback | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Version: | Severity: Neutral
Resolution: | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-----------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by fenris02):
Rather than blind-siding these people, has anyone attempted to contact
them to see if they want to be involved?
* If they do not want to be involved, no voting is required. Just -o them
upon request.
* If no response, vote is perfect, but the general nature of this means
they are not interested enough to respond to the former.
* If they respond and actively want to participate, they should likely be
provided some time to get involved. If that time passes and still no
involvement takes place, vote as above.
Many of those names are simply MIA, so I do not see this as a major issue.
I would hesitate to vote on any person listed that is either FPO or a
Board member. Just a cautionary item to note.
Office administration type detail, the FAS group should not have people in
it that are not +o in any of the four mentioned channels. There is no
hard requirement that I know of for being +o in some channel and not
belonging to the FAS group. (unidirectional)
To illustrate:
FAS group member => also has +o in one or more of #fedora, #fedora-
social, #fedora-ops, #fedora-unregistered.
+o member => may or may not be in FAS group. Preferably, they are but
may have some reason to not include themselves.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/107#comment:6>
irc-support-sig <
irc://irc.freenode.net/#fedora>
Feedback and tracking of issues for the folks who try and improve support in #fedora on
irc.freenode.net