-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2011 11:30 AM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 04:24, warren <warren(a)fedoraos.org>
wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>
> Kevin,
>
> Here's where I'm currently at (and I will try to make it as
> crystal clear as possible) before we even go any further.
>
> 1. This is a large undertaking, not a one man task and
> definitely not something only I see. It's *going* to ruffle
> feathers because things *will* change if this path is taken. You
> know as well as I do that change is most often not well accepted,
> regardless of intent or need. I do however agree that everything
> should be put to a vote, each item clearly stated, understood and
> voted for in a peer-viewable and organized manner. i.e. not
> hidden, obfuscated or obscured in any way.
>
> 2. You seem to be the only with with enough interest to even
> reply, save Thomasj who misread, misinterpreted and simply fired
> back negatively based on who I am, and not the content or
> context of the original email to this thread without the benefit
> of doubt or clarification that he understood what he thought he
> did. Granted, I should not have replied at all to him based on
> that alone. It seems we were both ignorant and still have work to
> do.
I haven't seen it was an old copy/paste. My mistake.
I'm over it and hope we can move past it, permanently. It takes 2 to
tango.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk7avXQACgkQI5ZhoGXYrD4qEACdGNW30yXcwPKc48Ev9VlmiUE5
G8EAn3tZDq7yR7/s0i6b5C7zvDACv/mR
=lwL+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----