On 2016/04/26 at 17:07, Thomas Haller wrote:
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 17:47 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
cc Daniel and network manager development team. They are experts on NM.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:45:23PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
Using NetworkManager or not using it can bring us so different behaviours and different /etc/resolv.conf. Could you give suggestion how we can make decision to choose a reasonable one since kdump probablly need to cope with both of them?
Hi,
Yes, NetworkManager's an initscript's interpretation differs in some aspects.
To quote `man nm-settings-ifcfg-rh`:
Semantic change of variables
NetworkManager had to slightly change the semantic for a few variables.
ยท PEERDNS - initscripts interpret PEERDNS=no to mean "never touch resolv.conf". NetworkManager interprets it to say "never add automatic (DHCP, PPP, VPN, etc.) nameservers to resolv.conf".
The behavior you described matches the documentation.
Thanks!
Then dracut follows NetworkManager at this point. But dracut does dhcp after handling nameservers in "nameserver=" and "ip=" specified by users, I guess NetworkManager does dhcp first, then appends DNS1&DNS2 in the ifcfg files.
I happened to spot a dracut DNS bug caused by the above-mentioned order, I will try to post a patch to see if can fix it to follow NetworkManager.
Regards, Xunlei
Thomas
-
Xunlei Pang