On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:16:09 -0600 Tim Flink tflink@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2015 13:09:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015 12:05:04 -0600 Tim Flink tflink@redhat.com wrote:
This was brought up a little while ago and we decided to put off the discussion a little bit but I'd like to re-start the conversation before we get too much farther with disposable clients.
My plan for how our hosts would be set up once we deploy support for disposable clients is this:
- virthosts would have N buildslave processes running on them
- each buildslave would launch VMs for disposable clients as
needed
- each virthost would have access to a shared filesystem used to store at least VM images, maybe logs and other data
Thats each virthost, not all virthosts having the same storage right?
All of the virthosts (at least in each group of dev/stg/prod) would have a chunk of shared storage used to store the canonical VM images that we use to boot the disposable clients (the disk changes would be done locally to the virthosts). This way we only have to build them once instead of once per virthost.
Would it be feasable to just build them once and rsync them between hosts? Or would you prefer shared storage?
In the back of my head, I'm thinking that it may make sense to store logs and artifacts on a chunk of shared storage instead of transferring everything to the taskotron master using buildbot. I figure that may make sense if the shared storage is already set up but this hasn't gotten past the "thinking about it" stage yet :).
Yeah. We may be able to do a netapp nfs volume, we will have to see what all we can do once we move to our new c-mode filer.
kevin