On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:49:58 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > The trigger is a piece of code which is responsible for starting
> > > the process of task execution.
> >
> > In this whole email you say 'task'. Do you mean 'check' in our
usual
> > terminology, or something else? Especially when describing the data
> > structures.
>
> Now I realized that we started to use 'check' in the code, but all
> our git repos are named 'task-*', and some of the READMEs use that
> term as well. Another thing to put in sync?
I suppose it depends on whether we want to use the current CheckDetail
implementation for non-check tasks. If we don't, then I think we'll
want to have something similar.
What are non-check tasks? :)
For the other doc stuff, yeah, we should probably get things in sync.
Tim
It's Task-o-tron, it suggests it's meant to execute _tasks_ :-) On the other hand,
check is more specific than task, it explains the purpose better. I guess native speakers
will need to deal with language subtleties. I just want to be consistent in naming, it
helps us and our users, that's all.