December 2008 - relnotes-content - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 187080] New: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187080 Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: ppc64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nag(a)uk.ibm.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: kwade(a)redhat.com The release notes stats that IBM pSeries machines, which has the POWER5 processors, are supported - great. pSeries machines can be used in three ways: 1) Stand alone as a SMP machine. 2) Using Logical Partitions with physical resources like real SCSI disks and Ethernet. 3) Using Logical Partitions with virtual resources like using ibmvscsi and ibmveth drivers. It is not clear in the release notes which modes are supported. I have just tried virtual resources - failed with unable to read package metadata, failure with a reference to repodata/comps.xml from anaconda Errno 256 I have just tried with physical resources - hangs loading a DAC960 driver, which is a RAID SCSI card. If you clarify which modes and hardware Fedora5 has been tested on, we might avoid many frustrations in Fedora users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

14 years, 7 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 372381] New: intel is the default driver

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372381 Summary: intel is the default driver Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: djuran(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Provide details here. Do not change the blocking bug. Hello. I've noticed that in http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Xorg.html it's written that i810 is the default driver. If I'm not mistaken, "intel" is the default driver for all intel graphics cards nowadays... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

14 years, 7 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 251737] New: Update the mediacheck procedure

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251737 Summary: Update the mediacheck procedure Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource(a)till.name QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com The Installer Beat (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Installer) mentioned two contradicting ways to verify the installation medium, which both seem to be wrong. In F7 Anaconda just asked whether or not to verify the medium without to manually edit the kernel commandline. When it is clear how to verify the F8 installations media, this should be described there, instead of the current contents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

14 years, 9 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 473325] New: Available Live Image spins URL points to wrong place

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Available Live Image spins URL points to wrong place https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473325 Summary: Available Live Image spins URL points to wrong place Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All URL: http:/// OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: medium Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: deanm(a)sharplabs.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora In Subsection 2.2.1 of: 2. What is New for Installation and Live Images the list of Live Image spins points back to Fedora 8 and Fedora 7 stuff. I suppose this is not the intended URL for the Fedora 10 release :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 10 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 477003] New: Release notes refer to Fedora 9 instead of Fedora 10

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Release notes refer to Fedora 9 instead of Fedora 10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477003 Summary: Release notes refer to Fedora 9 instead of Fedora 10 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: idirectscm(a)aim.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The index.html included in the Fedora 10 release notes references Fedora 9 instead of Fedora 10. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html fedora-release-notes-10.0.0-1.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a web browser. 2. Enter 'file:///usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html' in the address bar. 3. Note the text "Make waves. Fedora 9 now available." This should be updated to Fedora 10. Actual results: "Make waves. Fedora 9 now available." is displayed. Expected results: Some text describing Fedora 10's availability. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 151189] Fedora release notes tracker bug

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151189 Bug 151189 depends on bug 473059, which changed state. Bug 473059 Summary: libflashsupport not in repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473059 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 473059] New: libflashsupport not in repository

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libflashsupport not in repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473059 Summary: libflashsupport not in repository Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmcallis(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 151189 Classification: Fedora <http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/en_US/What_is_the_Latest_...> First command in first paragraph: # yum install libflashsupport Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments No package libflashsupport available. Nothing to do Looks familiar to the F9 content... Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 151189] Fedora release notes tracker bug

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151189 Bug 151189 depends on bug 473045, which changed state. Bug 473045 Summary: F10 Release Notes give incorrect information for NFS ISO installs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473045 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 473045] New: F10 Release Notes give incorrect information for NFS ISO installs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: F10 Release Notes give incorrect information for NFS ISO installs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473045 Summary: F10 Release Notes give incorrect information for NFS ISO installs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: medium Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tom(a)compton.nu QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora The F10 release notes (section 2.1.3.1) says that to PXE boot to an NFS ISO installation you now need to add "method=nfsiso:server:/path" to the command line. There are several problems with this: (a) method= is apparently deprecated in favour of rep0= (b) adding it doesn't seem to achieve anything as I am still prompted for a source and choosing an NFS install still works On top of that the actual information which would be useful is that you now have to extract install.img from the ISO and place it in an images directory alongside the ISO on your NFS server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 475723] New: incorrect formatting for a command

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: incorrect formatting for a command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475723 Summary: incorrect formatting for a command Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/en_US/ Upfront_About_Multimedia.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmcallis(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: <http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/en_US/Upfront_About_Multi...> In "3.1.1. Multimedia players", the last command (after "While using the Xine back-end, it is possible to temporarily use..."), does not have the blue background like the other commands. I guess a different tag was used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content December 2008