relnotes-content December 2014

relnotes-content@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
21 discussions

[Bug 1158767] New: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not verified anymore
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 May '15

15 May '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158767 Bug ID: 1158767 Summary: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not verified anymore Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tmraz(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr) OpenSSL was patched to disallow verification of certificates that are signed with MD5 algorithm. The use of MD5 hash algorithm for certificate signatures is now considered as insecure and thus all the main crypto libraries in Fedora were patched to reject such certificates. Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not present on public https web sites anymore but they can be still in use on private networks or used for authentication on openvpn based VPNs such as in bug 1157260. It is highly recommended to replace such certificates with new ones signed with SHA256 or at least SHA1. As a temporary measure the OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY environment variable can be set to allow verification of certificates signed with MD5 algorithm. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083 [Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001349] New: NetworkManager Bridging Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '15

11 Apr '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001349 Bug ID: 1001349 Summary: NetworkManager Bridging Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, psimerda(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998568 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998568 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bridging Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBridging NetworkManager should be able to configure bridge interfaces with commonly used options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without disrupting their operation. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1060216] New: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060216 Bug ID: 1060216 Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: limburgher(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr) gpodder is being upgraded from 2.20.3 to 3.5.2. There is a configuration and date storage change between these versions. After upgrading the RPM, any user on the system who uses gpodder, prior to opening it, should run /usr/bin/gpodder-migrate2tres, which will migrate the user's data and configuration to the new format, including all subscribed feeds and downloaded podcasts. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083 [Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 1150394] New: Please update I18n Documentation Beat for Fedora 21
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150394 Bug ID: 1150394 Summary: Please update I18n Documentation Beat for Fedora 21 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: We recently update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat for google-noto-fonts which added 44 new subpackages to cover Unicode. Please update it to your latest notes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Not updated Expected results: Should have latest Documentation_I18n_Beat Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1008185] New: ACPICA Tools Update
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008185 Bug ID: 1008185 Summary: ACPICA Tools Update Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ahs3(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, okrh(a)johnfreed.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998504 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998504 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: ACPICA Tools Update For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AcpicaTools For developers working with the ACPI subsystem, there are tools available from the reference implementation at http://www.acpica.org. These tools have been restructured over time and the current Fedora packages as a result contain either outdated versions or do not make available a complete set of tools. We propose an acpica-tools package that replaces both the existing iasl package and the the existing pmtools package in order to make all current tools available, and make it more straightforward in the future to keep them up-to-date. --- Additional comment from Al Stone on 2013-08-28 18:08:23 EDT --- Package has been uploaded into git and builds done for all architectures for f20. --- Additional comment from John Freed on 2013-09-09 04:02:26 EDT --- acpica-tools obsoletes pmtools, but it appears it should also obsolete iasl: Transaction check error: file /usr/bin/iasl from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64 file /usr/share/man/man1/iasl.1.gz from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64 Erasing iasl and installing acpica-tools works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1177951] New: Fedora 21 Release Notes claim 3.16.3 kernel version
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177951 Bug ID: 1177951 Summary: Fedora 21 Release Notes claim 3.16.3 kernel version Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The Fedora 21 Release Notes claim the 3.16.3 kernel version in Section 3.1, but my understanding is that Fedora 21 is using 3.17.*. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 21 How reproducible: Read documentation Steps to Reproduce: 1. Read Fedora 21 Release Notes, Section 3.1 2. Inspect https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel, which claims 3.17.6 Actual results: 3.16.3 Expected results: 3.17.something (possibly 3.17.6, but I'm not sure what is on the media) Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008203] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008203 Bug ID: 1008203 Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pspacek(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tbabej(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998522 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured zones. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. --- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT --- It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for Fedora 20 beta. From: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface (i.e. revert patches for user interface) --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT --- Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version to rawhide. Thanks for update! ----------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion available at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1069985] New: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Dec '14

07 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069985 Bug ID: 1069985 Summary: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Release notes for Fedora 20 contains nothing about the changes to kickstart options. It would be helpful if changes to kickstart options will be noticed in future release notes too. Now I know that I have to check the wiki diffs of the Anaconda/Kickstart wiki page to see the changes, but other administrators may check only the release notes. An example is the "--addsupport=" option to the "lang" kickstart option which was added to Fedora 20 (I assume... - I have no information about the time of the change), together with "%packages ... -instLangs=..." still not implemented. Please see also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051816#c11 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 release notes. How reproducible: Always. Another note: This request is to improve the next release notes. But I want to note that there should a place (web page, wiki page, etc.) too where additional (late) informations can be added to release notes of already released Fedora versions. Is such a place available? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1060328] New: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060328 Bug ID: 1060328 Summary: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed (section 2.8.1) during normal installs. It appears, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSyslog, that it got moved from @core to @standard. However, I suspect that a lot of users will do installs that include @standard, and as a result they will get rsyslog installed and perhaps be confused as to why they got it when the Release Notes imply it is no longer included. I can confirm that the repodata/ac802acf81ab55a0eca1fe5d1222bd15b8fab45d302dfdf4e626716d374b6a64-Fedora-20-comps.xml file on the x86_64 install DVD contains rsyslog in the @standard package group. Also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSendmail implies that sendmail got moved from @core to @standard, whereas it appears to me that it actually got removed from both of them (at least I can't find it anywhere in the comps.xml file). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 x86_64 DVD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1171368] New: "KDE Software Collection" means "KDE Software Compilation"?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171368 Bug ID: 1171368 Summary: "KDE Software Collection" means "KDE Software Compilation"? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The Fedora 21 release notes refer to "KDE Software Collection" in section desktop-KDE-4-14-and-SDDM in Desktop.xml [1]. Does the notes mean "KDE Software Compilation"[2] by "KDE Software Collection"? [1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/release-notes.git/tree/en-US/Desktop… [2] https://www.kde.org/community/whatiskde/softwarecompilation.php Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): f21 Expected results: Not "KDE Software Collection" but "KDE Software Compilation"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content December 2014