[Bug 1158767] New: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not verified anymore
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158767
Bug ID: 1158767
Summary: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are
not verified anymore
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tmraz(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr)
OpenSSL was patched to disallow verification of certificates that are signed
with MD5 algorithm. The use of MD5 hash algorithm for certificate signatures is
now considered as insecure and thus all the main crypto libraries in Fedora
were patched to reject such certificates.
Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not present on public https web
sites anymore but they can be still in use on private networks or used for
authentication on openvpn based VPNs such as in bug 1157260. It is highly
recommended to replace such certificates with new ones signed with SHA256 or at
least SHA1. As a temporary measure the OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY environment
variable can be set to allow verification of certificates signed with MD5
algorithm.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083
[Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 11 months
[Bug 1001349] New: NetworkManager Bridging Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001349
Bug ID: 1001349
Summary: NetworkManager Bridging Support
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, psimerda(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998568
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998568 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bridging Support
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBridging
NetworkManager should be able to configure bridge interfaces with commonly used
options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without
disrupting their operation.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years
[Bug 1060216] New: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060216
Bug ID: 1060216
Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note
suggestion/content
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: limburgher(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr)
gpodder is being upgraded from 2.20.3 to 3.5.2. There is a configuration and
date storage change between these versions. After upgrading the RPM, any user
on the system who uses gpodder, prior to opening it, should run
/usr/bin/gpodder-migrate2tres, which will migrate the user's data and
configuration to the new format, including all subscribed feeds and downloaded
podcasts.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083
[Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 2 months
[Bug 1150394] New: Please update I18n Documentation Beat for Fedora 21
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150394
Bug ID: 1150394
Summary: Please update I18n Documentation Beat for Fedora 21
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
We recently update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat for
google-noto-fonts which added 44 new subpackages to cover Unicode.
Please update it to your latest notes.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Not updated
Expected results:
Should have latest Documentation_I18n_Beat
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 2 months
[Bug 1008185] New: ACPICA Tools Update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008185
Bug ID: 1008185
Summary: ACPICA Tools Update
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: ahs3(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
okrh(a)johnfreed.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998504
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998504 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: ACPICA Tools Update
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AcpicaTools
For developers working with the ACPI subsystem, there are tools available from
the reference implementation at http://www.acpica.org. These tools have been
restructured over time and the current Fedora packages as a result contain
either outdated versions or do not make available a complete set of tools. We
propose an acpica-tools package that replaces both the existing iasl package
and the the existing pmtools package in order to make all current tools
available, and make it more straightforward in the future to keep them
up-to-date.
--- Additional comment from Al Stone on 2013-08-28 18:08:23 EDT ---
Package has been uploaded into git and builds done for all architectures for
f20.
--- Additional comment from John Freed on 2013-09-09 04:02:26 EDT ---
acpica-tools obsoletes pmtools, but it appears it should also obsolete iasl:
Transaction check error:
file /usr/bin/iasl from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64
conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man1/iasl.1.gz from install of
acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64
Erasing iasl and installing acpica-tools works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 3 months
[Bug 1177951] New: Fedora 21 Release Notes claim 3.16.3 kernel version
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177951
Bug ID: 1177951
Summary: Fedora 21 Release Notes claim 3.16.3 kernel version
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: low
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
The Fedora 21 Release Notes claim the 3.16.3 kernel version in Section 3.1, but
my understanding is that Fedora 21 is using 3.17.*.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 21
How reproducible: Read documentation
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Read Fedora 21 Release Notes, Section 3.1
2. Inspect https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel, which claims 3.17.6
Actual results:
3.16.3
Expected results:
3.17.something (possibly 3.17.6, but I'm not sure what is on the media)
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1008203] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008203
Bug ID: 1008203
Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pspacek(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tbabej(a)redhat.com,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998522
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC
FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured
zones.
--- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT ---
This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned
for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule.
--- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT ---
It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for
Fedora 20 beta.
From:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan
Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface
(i.e. revert patches for user interface)
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT ---
Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently
planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version
to rawhide.
Thanks for update!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion available at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193...
Please document this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1069985] New: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069985
Bug ID: 1069985
Summary: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart
options
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Release notes for Fedora 20 contains nothing about the changes to kickstart
options.
It would be helpful if changes to kickstart options will be noticed in future
release notes too. Now I know that I have to check the wiki diffs of the
Anaconda/Kickstart wiki page to see the changes, but other administrators may
check only the release notes.
An example is the "--addsupport=" option to the "lang" kickstart option which
was added to Fedora 20 (I assume... - I have no information about the time of
the change), together with "%packages ... -instLangs=..." still not
implemented.
Please see also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051816#c11
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 20 release notes.
How reproducible:
Always.
Another note:
This request is to improve the next release notes.
But I want to note that there should a place (web page, wiki page, etc.) too
where additional (late) informations can be added to release notes of already
released Fedora versions. Is such a place available?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1060328] New: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060328
Bug ID: 1060328
Summary: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no
longer installed
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
The Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed (section
2.8.1) during normal installs. It appears, according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSyslog, that it got moved
from @core to @standard. However, I suspect that a lot of users will do
installs that include @standard, and as a result they will get rsyslog
installed and perhaps be confused as to why they got it when the Release Notes
imply it is no longer included. I can confirm that the
repodata/ac802acf81ab55a0eca1fe5d1222bd15b8fab45d302dfdf4e626716d374b6a64-Fedora-20-comps.xml
file on the x86_64 install DVD contains rsyslog in the @standard package group.
Also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSendmail implies
that sendmail got moved from @core to @standard, whereas it appears to me that
it actually got removed from both of them (at least I can't find it anywhere in
the comps.xml file).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 x86_64
DVD.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 5 months