On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 09:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
You're using the correct patch (the rosintegration-v2 patch.) It
was
created against PCL 1.6.0, so it should apply cleanly when using the
current srpm. I tried it last night, and it seems to be working OK (I
didn't sit through the whole build process though, just through CMake
and the first couple files)
Hi Rich,
I think the other patches are conflicting with the ros integration
patch:
Patch0: PCL-1.4.0-Source-fedora.patch
Is this patch still required? It's for 1.4? My spec is here:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/5892/93885136
The build that I tried last night was against the ROS Fuerte
underlay
from my copr[1], if you're interested I could create a ros-fuerte-pcl
srpm and build it there pretty easily.
At the moment, I need to run fuerte on my fedora system for work,
somehow. It'd be great if you could provide a pcl package that would
work :)
PS: The project I'm working on might shift to Groovy in the near future.
Some folks tried it and said that there are huge improvements in Groovy.
I might look into packaging Groovy in the near future.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/