-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2012 06:03 PM, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
Hi Dominick,
thanks for your reply, see responses below:
On September 18, 2012 22:31:02 Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 13:32 -0600, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
>> What I really wander about is - above I've opened up quite a few
>> things that are very specific to this mode of operation, however I
>> can't believe I'm in a situation nobody else have been before and there
>> are no booleans/tunables for most of things outlined above. So is there
>> a way to make above utilize existing hooks or is it "as good as it
>> gets"?
>
> Hi
>
> This actually looks pretty good in this case and well suited for a
> boolean in the postgresql policy in my opinion.
good to know it's not just me who thinks that way :)
> Currently this is indeed not supported by the policy it seems.
>
> Why not file a bugzilla report as a feature request?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858406
How about something like this?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlBZp68ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNuUwCg4J5K2/hp2SKtErkD9QDz7zKQ
HDgAoN60dC2w8HxHXslnjNKZjT4LjezZ
=c99A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----