proceeding on [[DocsProject]] renaming

[Karsten Wade]

I still think we need to rename and categorize the Docs Project pages,
although I am seeing the wisdom in Paul's suggestion of scrapping it
all and starting over.

Can we pick a deadline for wikibot to do this?  If it cannot happen by
13 Feb., I propose we:

* Hand move a small set of pages
* Create a new, simpler structure on the [[Docs Project]] page
* (Re)write process content
* Move whatever else needs it
* Categorize as we go:
  [[Category:Docs Project]]
    [[Category:Docs Project archives]]
    [[Category:Docs Project process]]
      [[Category:Docs Project process to join]]
      [[Category:Docs Project process for leader selection]]
      [[Category:Docs Project process etc.]]
    [[Category:Docs Project meetings]]
    [[Category:Docs Project meeting logs]]
  [[Category:Documentation]]
  [[Category:How to]]

Any other thoughts?

This is a need for Docs that is hard to get around.  It's hard to
clean up content without other content being at the intended link
location, without categories to see where the holes and repitition
are.  That is why I've been pushing for the renaming as a dependency
for the fixing of Docs process content.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:21:31AM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
>  I still think we need to rename and categorize the Docs Project
> pages,
>  although I am seeing the wisdom in Paul's suggestion of scrapping it
>  all and starting over. 
Heh, I knew you'd come around sooner or later! :-)  Kidding.

>  Can we pick a deadline for wikibot to do this?  If it cannot happen
> by
>  13 Feb., I propose we:
>  
>  * Hand move a small set of pages
>  * Create a new, simpler structure on the [[Docs Project]] page
>  * (Re)write process content
>  * Move whatever else needs it
>  * Categorize as we go:
>    [[Category:Docs Project]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project archives]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project process]]
>        [[Category:Docs Project process to join]]
>        [[Category:Docs Project process for leader selection]]
>        [[Category:Docs Project process etc.]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project meetings]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project meeting logs]]
>    [[Category:Documentation]]
>    [[Category:How to]]
>  
>  Any other thoughts?
>  
>  This is a need for Docs that is hard to get around.  It's hard to
>  clean up content without other content being at the intended link
>  location, without categories to see where the holes and repitition
>  are.  That is why I've been pushing for the renaming as a dependency
>  for the fixing of Docs process content. 
I second this motion -- let's set a deadline for this and get it
done.  It's super if everyone's ready to go at the same time, but if
not, let's allow individual teams to progress where possible by
getting their renames done.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

[Eric Christensen]

On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:56 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:21:31AM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
>  > I still think we need to rename and categorize the Docs Project pages,
>  > although I am seeing the wisdom in Paul's suggestion of scrapping it
>  > all and starting over.
>  
>  Heh, I knew you'd come around sooner or later! :-)  Kidding.
>  
>  > Can we pick a deadline for wikibot to do this?  If it cannot happen by
>  > 13 Feb., I propose we:
>  > 
>  > * Hand move a small set of pages
>  > * Create a new, simpler structure on the [[Docs Project]] page
>  > * (Re)write process content
>  > * Move whatever else needs it
>  > * Categorize as we go:
>  >   [[Category:Docs Project]]
>  >     [[Category:Docs Project archives]]
>  >     [[Category:Docs Project process]]
>  >       [[Category:Docs Project process to join]]
>  >       [[Category:Docs Project process for leader selection]]
>  >       [[Category:Docs Project process etc.]]
>  >     [[Category:Docs Project meetings]]
>  >     [[Category:Docs Project meeting logs]]
>  >   [[Category:Documentation]]
>  >   [[Category:How to]]
>  > 
>  > Any other thoughts?
>  > 
>  > This is a need for Docs that is hard to get around.  It's hard to
>  > clean up content without other content being at the intended link
>  > location, without categories to see where the holes and repitition
>  > are.  That is why I've been pushing for the renaming as a dependency
>  > for the fixing of Docs process content.
>  
>  I second this motion -- let's set a deadline for this and get it
>  done.  It's super if everyone's ready to go at the same time, but if
>  not, let's allow individual teams to progress where possible by
>  getting their renames done. 
+1

[Ian Weller]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:21:31AM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
>  I still think we need to rename and categorize the Docs Project
> pages,
>  although I am seeing the wisdom in Paul's suggestion of scrapping it
>  all and starting over.
>  
>  Can we pick a deadline for wikibot to do this?  If it cannot happen by
>  13 Feb., I propose we:
>  
>  * Hand move a small set of pages
>  * Create a new, simpler structure on the [[Docs Project]] page
>  * (Re)write process content
>  * Move whatever else needs it
>  * Categorize as we go:
>    [[Category:Docs Project]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project archives]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project process]]
>        [[Category:Docs Project process to join]]
>        [[Category:Docs Project process for leader selection]]
>        [[Category:Docs Project process etc.]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project meetings]]
>      [[Category:Docs Project meeting logs]]
>    [[Category:Documentation]]
>    [[Category:How to]]
>  
>  Any other thoughts?
>  
>  This is a need for Docs that is hard to get around.  It's hard to
>  clean up content without other content being at the intended link
>  location, without categories to see where the holes and repitition
>  are.  That is why I've been pushing for the renaming as a dependency
>  for the fixing of Docs process content.
>   
Unequivocal agreement... if I can't wrestle the necessary information
and other necessary things from Mike and Nigel then we ought to go ahead
with a manual rename of whatever files are necessary.

-- 
Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com&gt;                  http://ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint:  E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226  B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
"Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet."
  ~ Douglas Adams